friendica.vrije-mens.org
The night before she flew home we sat at the now closed Denny’s and chatted. Neither one of us realizing we liked each other. I forget how it happened but I started to sing a silly kids song. She said she fell in love with me at that moment.
After she went home a mutual friend told us each how much the other liked the other. I moved across the country to live with her a month and a half later. But then after a few months I moved out and drove north several states to live with my dad’s family. Her and I drifted apart and I started to date another woman. We had a kid and then she left me for my best friend.
My now wife and I had kept in touch through email and remained friends. She decided to come up and see me for a weekend. We got engaged a month later, and married 2 months after that. That was 23 years ago next month.
We now live back across the country in my home town. Our baby is about to start college. And we rescue cats and dogs in our spare time (7 & 3 are the current totals).
Bibliotecari e informatici in lotta per il futuro della conoscenza e per un mondo migliore.Marco Calamari (Le Alternative)
I been having issues with the cheap hp gaming laptop with Linux, One CPU core runs at 100% no matter that do i tried masking and disabling stuff, changing the Network card, adding Ram, and some desktops like Gnome forks had issues as well, KDE, and Mate work fine but it looks like it maybe has a Firmware, Driver or a Kernel issue, so far i tested it with Fedora, Fedora rawhide, Ubuntu and Mint, I'm going to test Debian next.
The laptop i had issues with Windows 11 works fine.
https://www.walmart.com/ip/HP-Victus-15-6-inch-FHD-144Hz-Gaming-Laptop-AMD-Ryzen-5-8645HS-NVIDIA-GeForce-RTX-4050-8GB-DDR4-512GB-SSD-Mica-Silver-2024/5395277312
Edit Only Gnome 3 forks have issues with the Nvidia Drivers i will retest it at a later date with a new install and one CPU thread runs at 100% with all DE's and OSes but Windows 11.
Edit 2 I think i found the issue AMD APUs on some systems with Nvidia GPUs will spam the system the bug report i found said to disable the iGPU. also Gnome forks work fine i think it was my fault for not disabling secure boot.
amd_pstate=guided/active on anything newer than Zen 2, although Arch Wiki says active is the default since kernel 6.5. Even if it doesn't seem to fix the problem, it's the preferred way to run those CPUs (if it works). guided + conservative scaling governor might help. Maybe it's just a reporting bug tho, wouldn't be a first for AMD.
Can you confirm if there are processes sucking up all that cpu usage?
Also, if it's only some desktops with that issue, then it's clearly not a lower level issue but something to do with GNOME and derivatives
More than distro hopping maybe try out a zen kernel or compiling kernel yourself and changing kernel config and scheduler, or a newer version of the stock kernel?
I’m not super current on what’s in each kernel but I’d expect latest mainline to handle newer processors better than some of the older stable kernels in some of the more mainstream slower releasing distros.
Hard to know for sure without knowing what exactly it is you’re trying to run, but since you’re using an AMD processor, I would guess it’s NOT a firmware/driver issue. New Intel processors would be a different story.
Even today, not every application is programmed to use multiple cores effectively, or at all. Again, we need to know what application(s) you’re running when this happens
Maybe worth trying an alternative OS with a different kernel entirely from Linux, as a live USB. For example Haiku or ArcaOS?
However if you've tried Windows and not had the issue then it may not add anything as you nay already have excluded defective hardware?
Fun investigations (tac and factor), things I never bothered to check the existence of until now (install -s), and fundamentals I glossed over ([). Pretty fun read.
And of course,
And that's why the '$cmd' command is my favourite Linux command.
This blog is my favorite Linux blog!
I love Robert and his YT antics - his whole "The X command is my favourite Linux command!" shtick was both funny AND informative!
There is this guy I like, I have reason to think he may like me too but we're both playing dumb, or maybe I'm just imagining it all.
Yes, that's how immature I am. Now please help me.
We've known each other for years and we seem to get close to each other, then we take distance, then close again, repeat, repeat, repeat.
I'm terrified of losing him as a friend for trying to be more than just that. I've already lost people for showing my interest and I've also had to burn the bridge with guys who wouldn't give me space or kept hitting up on me repeatedly. This happens.
I would like to create a consistent, regular conversation going on. I'm afraid of overwhelming him so I don't even know what's a good frequency to reach out.
Personally the biggest challenge for me is finding ways to deepen our conversations. Things tend to stay pretty much on the surface most of the time, even though we can talk of almost any topic openly. Another barrier is our very different interests, we have almost no shared media in common (different music, different shows watched/liked, different videogames liked etc).
Usually when talking to other friends, conversations tend to naturally steer towards more meaningful topics. I don't know if I'm inadvertently holding myself back with him, or if finding meaningful topics has always been a thing started by the other person and I've never realized it.
So, any tips?
Have you got ways to deepen conversations?
Guys, have girls ever impressed you positively and how?
Thanks
Your and his age are gonna be major variables here. Conversations and relationships work very differently at different life stages.
You sound like you're maybe a teenager? Try asking interesting questions that require some thought to answer, but still leave room for your friend to give an easy thoughtless answer if they want to. Where do you think we'll be in X years? What's something you thought you wanted but as you've gotten okay have realised you actually don't? What do you think we do now thar future generations will think is crazy? Listen to his answers and ask followup questions.
Personally, I've always been most impressed by directness, honesty, intelligence and courage.
Yes. A professional is much better than ransom lemmy advice.
Your therapist should help you realise that the worse case scenario (rejection) has already happened to you many times in other forms, and you survived.
Okay, fifty year old asshole here. I've danced the dance more than a few times.
Don't waste time fucking around. You have the feeling, you be up front, honest, and let whatever happens happen.
A real friend? Trying to go romantic and failing won't change a thing long term. A real friendship is too deep to destroy by just not working romantically. And if it isn't that deep a friendship? Then something would have ended it eventually.
Now, if things don't work, but only one of you thinks that, it can take time and work to move past, but it will if the friendship was real in the first place because you'll value each other more than the failure can break.
You also have to be prepared to hear a no, and then learn to move past the no. If you can't, then chances are it wasn't that good a friendship to begin with.
There's going to be nerves, but you just open up, let it go, and let the other person respond. Don't do any big gestures, no movie crap. Just be the person you are and talk about it.
Me? Once I got past the whole fear of rejection thing, it was always easy to just say "hey, we're pretty close, and I'm feeling some extra love here, beyond the friendship part of things. It seems that's reciprocated, so how about we try this? Let's do a formal date and see if that gives us a jumping off point."
The conversation goes from there to whatever the next thing is. Sometimes it's a no, and solutions it's a yes and things don't work. But sometimes it's a yes, and things do work.
Right now, me and my wife (that started as friends, and didn't even realize we were moving into romance until I told her I loved her and things moved kinda on their own) have occasional dinners with three of my exes that are still good friends. And I'm still in contact with others that aren't close enough location wise to have many visits.
Tbh, the only exes that I'm either not still friends with, or wouldn't be if we were in the same location, were ones that didn't start as friends.
Seriously, the next time y'all are going to be together, when there's a moment that the feeling it's going somewhere, say something.
This is a good one. Maybe there isn't a way? Maybe it's not the right time?
My wife and I are two people with different interests who just happen like each other and have a family together-we often comment on how if we had met any earlier in our lives we would definitely not like each other.
For the most part of our marriage I worked alot. But we were always together when we could be.
Currently this is the most we have been together (last 6yrs of 25) because we now work together in our own place, and the kids have grown and moved out....and we still like each other!
Love is not a question if you like each other, and you can be two people who are together. You don't have to have deep meaningful conversations to make a good relationship, my partner is a empathetic, thoughtful and philosophical person and I tend to go for the fart jokes.
But we get each other. Do you guys get each other then you are together?
Hopefully this rambling statement makes sense, from a different perspective. I'm tired and am having my first cup of coffee.
Would you say what you're seeking is "more intimacy," up to, potentially, the most possible intimacy?
I would suggest looking at his different interests and getting curious. If you're interested in the guy, it should be pretty easy to find reasons why this film or that game are endearingly-this-or-that in a way that makes you like and respect him even more.
Then, you bond over it; by trusting his taste (intimacy) enough to check out that show or whatever interest, you now have an opportunity to get deep (intimacy) into what you each individually felt (intimacy) about it, and maybe you felt something in common. That's some foundation for intimacy.
The nuerodivergent part suggests you're going to just need to be direct.
"I really enjoy our friendship, it's important to me. I want to make sure we keep that friendship regardless, but I've also realized I might be developing more romantic feelings for you that I'd like to explore together - maybe you've had thoughts/feelings like that about me before? If not, that's cool, I just feel better having said it to you so it's out of my head 😀 but yeah, I like you and I'd like us to get dinner on an actual date date sometime and see how we both feel. What do you think?"
Or there's always Margaret Cho's technique...
Ahhh fk.
I appreciate the replies though.
I don't know about Margaret Cho, guess I'll have to look it up
You just risk staying in limbo if not direct/literal effigy IMO... All young males in general have the earned reputation of typically being oblivious of expressed female romantic advances (just search Reddit, you'll see 300 posts speaking to this per day). On top of that general difficulty, you have the compounding factor of their atypical mental processing.
So do what you think is right. Hope it works out for you both.
I never had much luck dating, tried shooting my shot with a handful of female friends I thought I was getting vibes from, never even got a first date, but stayed friends with them.
The only 2 times I successfully ended up dating someone, the girl took the initiative and kissed me first.
First one was someone I'd just recently met, didn't really pick up on any vibes, maybe she was putting out a ton of them and I was too much of a dumbass to pick up on them, I just thought she seemed cool and wanted to hang out with her, didn't really have any romantic intentions in mind. Then she kissed me, I kind of had to quickly rewire my brain and I decided "ok, let's see where this goes." Didn't work out long term, but we had some fun for a while. I did not stay friends with her, she got kind of weird towards the end, and I found out years later that she was very likely cheating on me towards the end, I wasn't my best self at the time either but I wasn't a cheater just a stupid teenager, I tried to leave the door open to remain friends but she wasn't having any of it.
The second time I'd been friends with her for a good long while, again, no romantic intentions on my part, she was cool, we hung out mostly with other friends, sometimes not. She kissed me as we were both leaving a party at the same time getting into our own cars. Really short circuited my brain a little and could not make sense of it. Kind of had to take a day to process it and talk to her to confirm that we were gonna try it out and see where it went. She'd apparently been laying on the flirting extra heavy and I picked up on absolutely none of it. I ended up marrying her, coming up on 6 years married and close to a decade together.
For a 3rd data point, there was a girl I really liked in high school. I'm pretty sure she was flirting with me pretty hard, and several other people even told me in pretty straightforward terms that she liked me. Never quite got out of my own head enough to make a move beyond some clumsy, mostly-joking-but-not-really flirting. I think I was kind of waiting for her to make it clear to me what she wanted in an unambiguous way, and she never quite did it in a way my brain interpreted as an "all systems go" signal.
For some context, the first time I was about 18 or 19 years old, and I started dating my wife in my mid 20s, my failed attempts were all scattered around my early 20s. I'm probably a little neurodivergent in some way, some very mild degree of autism if I had to guess, and depending on who you ask I'm either a shy extrovert or an unusually outgoing introvert (the bit in Clerks about Randall hating people but loving gatherings resonates with me.)
I think the takeaway here is to go for it and don't beat around the bush. Keep an open mind that he may not be into you that way, but that means he doesn't want to lose your friendship either. If it's going to happen, one of you needs to make a move, and there's a chance that he's just as stupid as I am and hasn't even really considered you romantically but if you force his hand he may go "oh shit, yeah, that sounds like a great idea, why didn't I think of that"
And even if stuff does implode, it doesn't work out, and you don't manage to stay friends, it's probably better than spending the rest of your life wondering about what could have been. I love my wife, wouldn't trade her for the world, and I'm confident that there's no one in the world who would be a better match for me, but I do wonder sometimes what sort of fun I could have had with my high school crush, even if it wouldn't have gone anywhere long-term. A couple weeks, months, or years of fun times would have been worth it. With the other girl I dated, even though things didn't work out, and I think we mutually dislike each other now, I still think fondly of the times we had together regardless of the unpleasantness that came after, if I got stuck in a time loop and ended up back then, I'd still date her even knowing it wasn't going anywhere.
Unfortunately I have no particular tips for improving conversation. Somehow I seem to do alright, but I couldn't, for the life of me, explain how I do it.
Thanks. I appreciate knowing first hand from a guy who didn't make the first move AND still got to stay with her for a long time; all other stories of girls making the first move I've heard either don't work or end in very short term relationships.
I think I'm not being demonstrative enough, and he probably thinks I'm not interested. There is enough reason for that. But it could also be that he's not wanting to commit to anything so he's not asking me anything. I dread this second option. I'm rambling already. What I'm trying to say, in response to your account of not getting the flirts, is that there was some flirting on both sides but also plenty of mixed signals.
I'm a man, my wife made the first move, and I'm very glad she did! Taking the step from friend (or even just acquaintances) to more is risky for anyone. But, and maybe I'm biased here, I think it's currently even more risky for guys. Word can get around, and you're more likely to not just lose the one friendship, but to be labeled "creepy" generally if you're wrong. Of course it's possible for that to happen to a woman, but it's way less likely for a woman to be perceived as a creep in general, and also men don't talk amongst themselves the way women tend to.
Anyway, I knew my wife from a social space, and I didn't want to be the guy who poisoned the environment and made it an uncomfortable location for women by pursuing any of them. So I was friendly and tried to be as non threatening as possible, which meant no asking out. So I was very relieved when she made a move!
Don't know if your situation is anything like that, I'm just unsure of your source that says "active woman means short term". I mean, think of all the dudes hitting on strangers in bars which either turns into a one night stand or a short fling. The averages have got to be better than that, right?
Thanks. I don't know where I got my sources, possibly internet experts, some of my friends, my mother, other women I've met briefly.
I am a recluse practically, and we've been meeting just the two of us so there would be no toxic environment or anything. The one with stakes to lose is me, since we work in a similar industry (well atm I'm on retail but hopefully I can find a job doing what I like again) and word spreads fast. I already have two embarrassing experiences with people who are in the industry and it does NOT look helpful at all when applying for jobs. I'm always wondering if any of those guys is ever reviewing applications and if that has any impact on it.
But what you say is true though. I hate this so much
Tricky, but you could take the approach of just putting it on the table:
"Hey, I have a weird random question... " And then ask if he thinks there is life elsewhere in the universe or what he thinks is going on with flat earthers or whatever. It isn't bad to be a bit random in timing.
In terms of timing specifics though, you don't want to do it in the middle of some other discussion, so you normally wait for a quiet moment or a lull in the current conversation. Typically depends on what's going on. I find something like building puzzles together is great for this, because you've both got something to do but it's not so intense as to block easy conversation that just meanders a bit. Just an example though.
When you are together, what are you normally doing? Long drives are easier to find ok moments, studying in the library or in the middle of a dentist appointment less so
I'll see what I can do. Maybe I'm too self conscious about coming with something out of the blue.
We tend to walk a lot around shops, or have a meal somewhere, or sometimes hang at a pub with his work mates. Occasionally a movie night. Got more suggestions for hanging out? I'm all eyes
So you want to try create the right moments for deeper conversation, I think that would be more likely away from his mates? I don't know them so just guessing.
With that in mind, maybe Google around for anything interesting or different happening in the area. A gardening or book faire, wine or coffee festival, anything relaxed. Then ask him if he wants to go. Ideally something quiet that has some walking around?
That might create helpful conditions.
As a dumb guy this would give me no clue. My 2c, if you're interested in him, just tell him. Plain, straight, no bullshit around. Don't try to obfuscate it or hide it in double meaning phrases, be as direct as possible.
If I can generalize, we guys are dumb idiots that usually can't read what women hide between lines. We need it in simple sentences, ideally in written form to be really sure we understand it right.
That dude is joking of course, but touching someone in a subtle manner can be used to both express and indicate interest.
If all else fails, entangle him with silk and consume him.
Shoot your shot, player.
Don’t go crazy or over the top, don’t overdo it, but just say it. If they’re a good friend they won’t be scared away. If they’re like you that way you’ll both be happier.
Don’t overthink it, ask them if they’d ever like to hang out or do something more like a date.
Ballsy, direct, badass. That can be you.
Dating is awkward but life gets a lot better once you get more comfortable with it. Everyone is a dating idiot until they’re not, there’s a good chance your friend is still in the idiot stage and maybe hell be over the moon that you helped push through it.
You could ask:
1. What’s your best quality?
2. What’s your worst quality?
3. What does “home” mean to you?
4. What’s your favorite childhood memory?
5. Who are your role models?
6. What is your relationship with your like?
7. What is your idea of happiness?
8. Where do you see yourself five years from now?
9. What goal are you working toward right now?
10. What’s the biggest challenge you’re facing right now?
11. What does retirement look like to you?
12. What’s a skill or quality you would like to develop in yourself?
13. Have you ever experienced a life-altering moment that changed your perspective?
14. What do you consider your biggest accomplishment so far?
15. What’s the most difficult thing you’ve ever been through?
16. How do you cope when you’re upset or stressed out?
17. What are you grateful for?
18. What’s the best piece of advice you’ve ever received?
19. What’s your worst habit?
20. If you could change one thing about yourself, what would it be?
Also is kinda tricky; on one hand you could try to find out what hobbies he likes and do them together somehow. But if you do too forceful it might be too much....
So what have you done so far?
I'll help with the deep conversation part. All conversations can go deep, if you keep questioning them.
It's hot out today.
-is it getting hotter every year?
Seems like it. I think it's global warming.
-what do you think the solutions are?
I think Gary is cool.
-what do you like about him?
He's got a sweet mustache
-have you always liked mustaches?
My uncle had a mustache, he used to takes us to cool places when we were kids.
-would you say your uncle had a big impact on your life?
The point is, if you keep inquiring a step deeper, the conversation inevitably becomes deep. Good luck, and have fun.
Most people have encouraged you to be direct, and they are right in that it will very quickly get you a yes no answer. And also that it’s more effective on men.
But it’s equally true that if someone isn’t expecting that at all, a confession can surprise and stress them, as they struggle to put their feelings towards you together and decide on a future right in that moment.
And that can sometimes lead to rejection when it might not have occurred had the way been paved a bit more gradually.
To get specific, that involves doing things with just the two of you. But it also usually involves doing a shared interest, which you’ve said you don’t have.
So if you’re serious, I would suggest you think about what you know of his interests, and seeing if there’s anything you’d potentially like to know more about/get involved in.
Then say something like “hey I’ve started getting into __ a little bit, and I know you’ve been into that for a while, do you know of any __ happening soon I could go to?”
If he has any interest in you at all and is not completely dense, he will usually mention something, and if he does he’ll possibly invite you. Even if it’s like “don’t know of anything now but that sounds fun”, that is also an invitation for you to look up and propose events.
Once you’re at __ together, as the “expert” in the topic he’ll naturally take on more of the “host” role, which will get him talking. If he stops, unfortunately it is usually the woman that has to “go fishing” for topics, since men are not very good at it. Luckily being at __, which you’re not familiar, with means your questions will be real and natural.
And then there is the simple fact that if a man said “I’m cold” and then leaned against a women, he would be thought as creepy, pushy, or presumptuous, but if a woman does it, it’s sweet and endearing even if the man doesn’t like them romantically, because it shows you feel safe with him.
But sometimes, a man doesn’t know how he feels until he’s forced to notice. That will get him to notice. And then he’ll decide, and since men are not very good about hiding their emotions, as they’ve never been forced to, you’ll almost certainly know his decision by how he behaves toward you after that.
And if you think the answers yes, it’s then when you’d be direct. Of course, if you’ve dropped enough hints, maybe you won’t have to.
I already responded somewhere else, but I have more response that doesn't make sense in that context.
First, about deepening conversation. I don't know about this guy, so I'll talk about myself. I have things I'm interested in, let's call them "interests", and I like to talk about them. And the only thing that stops me from talking about them constantly to everyone is the social understanding that they don't want to hear about my interests.
So all it takes to have me talk about stuff is enough questions to demonstrate you really want to know.
"What do you like about blah blah blah?" will probably get a short answer because he's used to people not really wanting to know more, so he's giving the smallest answer that answers the question. But then, you ask a question about his answer. "Huh, how is that different than blah blah?"
Now maybe longer answer, you listen and ask based on that, and if you can manage it you could also circle back to a previous answer to connect some dots. That's now a discussion! Now, of course, you do have to listen. Unsure if that's a skill of yours or not.
As for the asking out, I think you should do it. But if you don't trust yourself to deliver the speech live, you could write it down / print it out. Just make sure it contains escape hatches for him that assure him it's okay if he doesn't share your feelings, and that he can just tell you if that's the case, and probably ends by saying he doesn't need to necessarily give you an answer now and you're just happy you could get it off your chest. I think going for something casual is better than something heartfelt and romantic, but I don't know the two of you. The most important thing is that he knows, and the second most important thing is that you don't want it to wreck things if feelings aren't mutual.
And if you don't want to awkwardly read it, you could just hand it to him and let him read it at his own pace. This lets you watch his face while reading, if he makes facial expressions and if you can read them.
I would recommend against an email or a text, though. It feels like, from the bits of your personality I've picked up here, the time between when you send it to whenever he responds is going to be absolute torture for you. Whereas he might just be busy and not have even seen it yet, you'll already be inventing bad scenarios and deciding which new city you should move to since you obviously can't stay here, etc, etc 😉
So probably best to deliver it in person, maybe at the end of a hangout, so you can be sure he received it and read it. And I know you may be scared, but don't tell him to read it after you're gone, because that's now email territory where you can't ever know if he's read it yet! Just have him read it, assure him it's okay if he doesn't agree, and let him respond. And even if he doesn't have an answer now, you know it's done.
Good luck!
I've been looking around for a scripting language that:
Do you know of something that would fit the bill?
Here's a use case (the one I run into today, but this is a recurring thing for me).
For my homelab I need (well, want) to generate a luhn mod n check digit (it's for my provisioning scripts to generate synchting device ids from their certificates).
I couldn't find ready-made utilities for this and I might actually need might a variation of the "official" algorithm (IIUC syncthing had a bug in their initial implementation and decided to run with it).
I don't have python (or even bash) available in all my systems, and so my goto language for script is usually sh (yes, posix sh), which in all honestly is quite frustrating for manipulating data.
I've actually tried using PHP on OpenWRT and embedded before. It's not exactly lightweight, it's a memory and CPU hog. Keep in mind that the kind of machine that runs OpenWRT might only have 32 or even 16 MB of RAM to work with.
Also, PHP is not the first language that comes to mind when doing data processing and/or functional programming. You can but it doesn't lend itself well to it.
Elixir is quite big (yeah, it's certainly smaller than something like java... sorry for not specifying what I mean by "small disk footprint").
Thats basically what ansible does. Thats basically what ansible does. If you plan on doing this to multiple machines you should just use ansible.
Ansible requires python on the target machine (or a lot of extra-hacky workarounds) so... I could just use python myself 😀
BTW getting ansible to do anything besides the very straightforward usecases it was meant for is a huge pain (even a simple if/else is a pain) and it's also super-slow, so I hate it passionately.
Also how do you plan on ensuring the scripting interpreter is installed on the machines?
Ideally I'd just copy the interpreter over via ssh when needed (or install it via the local package manager, if it's available as a package)
Also you mentioned provisioning scripts, is that Ansible? If so python is already there, if you mean really just bash scripts I can tell you that does not scale well. Also if you already have some scriptsz what language are they on? Why not write the function there??
Currently it's mostly nixos, plus a custom thing that generates preconfigured openwrt images that I then deploy manually. I have a mess of other vms and stuff, but I plan to phase out everything and migrate to nixos (except the openwrt stuff, since nixos doesn't run on mips).
I don't really need to run this specific synchthing-ID script except on my PC (I do the provisioning from there), but I have written scripts that run on my router (using busybox sh) and I was wondering if there is a "goto" scripting that I can use everywhere.
I fear I am not enough reverse (or Polish, for that matter) 😀
Anyway, I have great esteem for you (if you actually use forth and are not just trolling)
Oh dude, you are so wrong!
Powershell is available for linux and will run the same modules that have made it such a success on Windows. Want to fire up vmware containers or get a list of vms? Want to talk to Exchange servers? Azure? AWX? $large-corporate-thing? Powershell is a very good tool for that, even if it smells very Microsofty.
The linux version works well - it has some quirks (excessive logging, a MS repo that needs manual approving that breaks automatic updates) but aside from those, it just works. I have several multi-year scripts that tick away nicely in the background.
🤖 Just a command runner. Contribute to casey/just development by creating an account on GitHub.GitHub
if there's something that I can adopt as a default goto solution without having to worry about how each system is packaged/configured.
Go is probably your best bet. Simple to use, and you can compile it so it runs everywhere
Yaegi is Another Elegant Go Interpreter. Contribute to traefik/yaegi development by creating an account on GitHub.GitHub
I don't have python (or even bash) available in all my systems, and so my goto language for script is usually sh (yes, posix sh), which in all honestly is quite frustrating for manipulating data.
Why are you making it hard on yourself? apt/dnf install a language to use and use it.
Kotlin script is fantastic! I wish it would become more popular. Dependency support, cached complier output, etc. I really like it for non-trivial scripting since you didn't need a venv for dependencies.
OP is being ridiculous about space requirements. 60MB is a rounding error these days.
Python is what you want. You can install it on just about any system.
Other than that maybe Lua but that will be hell.
Python is what you want. You can install it on just about any system.
Perl and bash are already there, no need to install anything.
Try it now - go on. Type "perl" and tell me what you get.
And if you're so certain it's not used, try removing it and see how well your computer works afterwards.
It isn't installed
I know that because I installed it as it was a dependency of Buildroot.
Edit: My bad I must of been thinking about a Perl library
Perl is already installed on most linux machines and unless you start delving into module usage, you won't need to install anything else.
Python is more fashionable, but needs installing on the host and environments can get complicated. I don't think it scales as well as Perl, if that's a concern of yours.
Perl is a step up in terms of developer comfort, but it’s at the same time too big and too awkward to use.
How do you mean?
It's already on nearly every distro, so there's no core size unless you lean into modules. The scripts aren't exactly big either.
pp and run the packed version on systems with no installed Perl, but at that point you might as well just use a compiled language.
LOL It is one of the most well known things about perl that the language is as mighty as probably no other programming language.
If python is too big for you and you're dealing with heterogeneous systems then you're probably stuck with sh as the lowest common denominator between those systems. I'm not aware of any scripting languages that are so portable you can simply install them with one file over scp.
Alternate route is to abandon a scripting interpreter completely and compile a static binary in something like Go and deploy the binary.
There was also some "compile to bash" programming languages that I've sneered at because I couldn't think of a use case but this might be one.
I would go with Guile, because it is built-in to the Guix Package Manager which is a really good general-purpose package manager.
It ticks several of your boxes:
It also has pretty good libraries for system maintenance and reporting:
- File-Tree-Walk
- A simple web server
- XML parsing
Guile is the GNU Ubiquitous Intelligent Language for Extensions, the official extension language for the GNU operating system.www.gnu.org
Since you like guile, I would recommend you checkout rash (search "rash shell language" on Google. Sorry too lazy to link it).
It is based on racket, but made to be shell-like, and is very nice. I believe guile used to have a similar project that isn't maintained anymore.
Not quite a scripting language, but I highly recommend you check out cosmo for your usecase. Cosmopolitan, and/or Actually Portable Executable (APE for short) is a project to compile a single binary in such a way that is is extremely portable, and that single binary can be copied across multiple operating systems and it will still just run. It supports, windows, linux, mac, and a few BSD's.
https://cosmo.zip/pub/cosmos/bin/ — this is where you can download precompiled binaries of certain things using cosmo.
From my testing, the APE version of python works great, and is only 34 megabytes, + 12 kilobytes for the ape elf interpreter.
In addition to python, cosmopolitan also has precompiled binaries of:
And a few more, like tclsh, zsh, dash or emacs (53 MB), which I'm pretty sure can be used as an emacs lisp intepreter.
And it should be noted these may require the ape elf interpeter, which is 12 kilobytes, or the ape assimilate program, which is 476 kilobytes.
EDIT: It also looks like there is an APE version of perl, and the full executable is 24 MB.
EDIT again: I found even more APE/cosmo binaries:
Janet is a functional and imperative programming language. It runs on Windows, Linux, macOS, FreeBSD and *nix.janet-lang.org
OP is on OpenWRT (a router distro), and Alpine. Those distros don't come with very much by default, and perl is not a core dependency for any of their default tools. Neither is python.
Based on the way the cosmo project has statically linked builds of python, but not perl, I'm guessing it's more difficult to create a statically linked perl. This means that it's more difficult to put perl on a system where it isn't already there, and that system doesn't have a package manager*, than python or other options.
*or the the user doesn't want to use a package manager. OP said they just want to copy a binary around. Can you do that with perl?
You've defined yourself into an impossible bind: you want something extremely portable, universal but with a small disk imprint, and you want it to be general purpose and versatile.
The problem is that to be universal and general purpose, you need a lot of libraries to interact with whatever type of systems you might have it on (and the peculiarities of each), and you need libraries that do whatever type of interactions with those systems that you specify.
E.g. under-the-hood, python's open("<filename>", 'r') is a systemcall to the kernel. But is that Linux? BSD? Windows NT? Android? Mach?
What if you want your script to run a CLI command in a subshell? Should it call "cmd"? or "sh"? or "powershell"? Okay, okay, now all you need it to do is show the contents of a file... But is the command "cat" or "type" or "Get-FileContents"?
Or maybe you want to do more than simple read/write to files and string operations. Want to have graphics? That's a library. Want serialization for data? That's a library. Want to read from spreadsheets? That's a library. Want to parse XML? That's a library.
So you're looking at a single binary that's several GBs in size, either as a standalone or a self-extracting installer.
Okay, maybe you'll only ever need a small subset of libraries (basic arithmetic, string manipulation, and file ops, all on standard glibc gnu systems ofc), so it's not really "general purpose" anymore. So you find one that's small, but it doesn't completely fit your use case (for example, it can't parse uci config files); you find another that does what you need it to, but also way too much and has a huge footprint; you find that perfect medium and it has a small, niche userbase... so the documentation is meager and it's not easy to learn.
At this point you realize that any language that's both easy to learn and powerful enough to manage all instances of some vague notion of "computer" will necessarily evolve to being general purpose. And being general purpose requires dependencies. And dependencies reduce portability.
At this point your options are: make your own language and interpreter that does exactly what you want and nothing more (so all the dependencies can be compiled in), or decide which criteria you are willing to compromise on.
Nah, gross. You need to set a bunch of global options to get sane behavior on errors.
Nushell is shaping up really really nicely, and it'll actually stop executing if something fails! Even if that happens in a pipe! And it's not super eager to convert between arrays and strings if you use the wrong cryptic rune.
I've looked into this a lot actually. There see many options. I'll highlight the pros and cons of each option.
Lua: extremely lightweight, but standard library is lacking, and doesn't include stuff like map or fold. But that would be easy to fix.
Python: thicc standard library, but is not lightweight by any means. There are modifications made to be more shell like, such as xonsh
Rash: based on scheme, very much functional but if you're not used to lisp style, might take a bit to get used to it. This is actually my favorite option. It has a cli interpreter, and really pleasant to use. Cons is... Well it's not very common
You can honestly use any language. Even most compiled languages have a way to run immediately.
OP is on OpenWRT
Fair point - I missed that, buried in the comments as it was.
In that scenario, you use what's available, I guess.
OP said they just want to copy a binary around. Can you do that with perl?
This is linux. Someone will have done it.
I use powershell for work as I need the m365 modules for work and its very flexible with decent module availability to plug in all sorts.
However it absolutely sucks for large data handling, anything over 10k rows is just horrendous, I typically work with a few million rows. You can make it work with using .Net to process it within your script but its something to be aware of. Being able to extend with .Net can be extremely useful.
I found installing Go-sdk a total PiTA. It is okay as a developer environment. But bash + gnu utils + core utils seem much more sane to me.
Of course I mostly work with Linux systems and hardly ever have to deal with Scripting for Windoze.
Even after using CPAN ? I found Perl to be much more "manageable" than Python.
Python with Venv and Pip at least works as expected. Which makes it easier.
(Chicken) Scheme.
Schemes have one of the best and most interactive interpreters
Is general purpose,
allows functional, procedural and OO programming,
small disk size and compilable to native executables,
Throughout documented and supplemented by years of research,
simple setup.
It also is CGI compatible, if necessary.
Python.
Just remember to use pyenv for interpreter installation, version and environment management. It's pretty straightforward that way and you have predictability.
Don't ever manually fiddle with the system python and/or libraries or you'll break your system. You should just rely on the package manager for that.
Simple Python version management. Contribute to pyenv/pyenv development by creating an account on GitHub.GitHub
>This widely used and highly active platform is a dumpster fire
>Try these instead
>"Are these platforms actually used by anyone?"
>idk lol
Thanks bro
Hier wird eine Sammlung ganz wunderbarer OpenSource-Software für dich bereitgestellt.tchncs.de
Ahh, sorry for the misunderstanding!
I think your best bet is to find politics communities on disboard
Because every other "generation" is about 10 years and yet somehow "Millennials" are an almost 25 year gap. Notice how it's "Older Millennial, younger millennial, etc". You don't use those qualifiers with the other generations because they are appropriately sized.
Millennials should be 2-3 named generations. It currently refers to 80's kids, 90s kids, any kids alive when 2000 happened, and early Aughts kids(probably because the last name sucked and no one wanted to use it). Too many generations wanted the claim of "I was the first generation of the new millennium" and everyone co-opted the term even when it didn't traditionally apply(newborns because they were closest to the date as opposed to when their major development occured is part of that stretch)
When I was growing up, the definitions kept changing.
I was born in 1986, and while in primary school I was told that makes me GenX. So I grew up thinking I was GenX. Then in high school, my teachers said actually anyone born after 1985 is GenY, so we're definitely GenY.
Then when year 2000 came around people started talking about a new generation of people who would "never remember the 20th century", or "never know a world without the internet", basically people born after 1997 so they grow up completely in the 2000s. They called them Millennials.
From then on the usage of "millennial" kept growing, starting to see it everywhere. Mostly by boomers complaining about millennials.
Around 2012 I stated seeing some youtubers around my age referring to themselves as millennials, I thought it was a joke, or a bad understanding. Then people started referring to me as a millennial. Someone who's whole childhood was in the 90s, how could I be a millennial, it defied the definition.
So I imagine my shock when I find now they've removed all trace of the usage of GenY, and retroactively applied "millennial" to mean anyone born after 1985. So maybe I am a millennial? I remember staying up late to celebrate with my parents and make sure our computer didn't crash at midnight on new years eve in 1999. I remember wondering why dragonballz wasn't on TV when the news was showing footage of American skyscrapers in 2001. Are those the things that make me a millennial? If so then what about the original definition? Those born 1997 or later won't remember those things, so now they're Zoomers? All this business makes me so confused.
Auf YouTube findest du die angesagtesten Videos und Tracks. Außerdem kannst du eigene Inhalte hochladen und mit Freunden oder gleich der ganzen Welt teilen.www.youtube.com
The crypto industry is making its mark on this year's elections to the tune of some $119 million.
The funding has largely come from two companies — Coinbase and Ripple — which are funneling money into super PACs like Fairshake PAC, which is dedicated to "elevating pro-crypto candidates and attacking crypto skeptics," according to Public Citizen.
At the 2024 bitcoin conference in Nashville in February, Trump — who called bitcoin "highly volatile and based on thin air" in 2019 — said he'd lay out a plan "to ensure that the United States will be the crypto capital of the planet and the bitcoin superpower of the world." Trump has already won the backing of several crypto enthusiasts, including his running mate JD Vance, who owns at least $250,000 in bitcoin.
Crypto companies have already funneled some $119 million into federal elections, according to data from Public Citizen.Lakshmi Varanasi (Insider)
Say what you want about cryptocurrency, but to address the energy problem,
The reason for this is the exact same reason the fediverse also uses a shit ton more energy than the centralized alternatives like reddit and extwitter.
Decentralization usually comes at a cost of performance or energy.
It's not good that so much energy is used to sustain it, but the only reason it is needed is so that it can stay fully decentralized.
Some blockchains use proof of stake for this reason, which greatly reduces the energy needed to less than .01% of what proof of work requires, but instead more money = more voting power.
I think that 99% of Cryptocurrencies are unnecessary and shouldn't exist.
But I also think that if I want to buy a private VPN, any payment method except monero completely invalidates the VPN because now your credit card is linked to the VPN instead.
And I think that transferring money to family members abroad with some ethereum l2 curency is a 100 times cheaper and faster than any other method. I had to pay student loans in another country, but my bank blocked the credit card transactions because they were foreign. The only other way was cryptocurrency with a tiny fee, or a bank transaction with 10% plus 50$ fees. Guess which one I picked.
For gifts maybe, but not for paying student loans. But gift card locations can be tracked to the store and be used to narrow down your location.
Also, aren't gift cards the biggest modern vehicle for scams?
I thought this was about VPNs?
Which bank accepts crypto to pay back student loans anyway?
they didn't say a bank specifically,
I had to pay student loans in another country, but my bank blocked the credit card transactions because they were foreign. The only other way was cryptocurrency with a tiny fee, or a bank transaction with 10% plus 50$ fees. Guess which one I picked.
Gift cards that act like credit/debit cards are harder to get than they used to be. I think all of the mainstream ones require identification or linking to a previous bank account per regulation now
The prepaid card issuer is required by law to verify your identity for most types of prepaid accounts. You may be asked to provide your full name, street address (no P.O. boxes), date of birth, and Social Security number, taxpayer identification number, or another identification number. (link)
I have solved this problem! The trick is to use two Docker containers:
Here is an example docker-compose.yml:
version: "3"
services:
gluetun:
image: qmcgaw/gluetun
container_name: gluetun
# line above must be uncommented to allow external containers to connect.
# See https://github.com/qdm12/gluetun-wiki/blob/main/setup/connect-a-container-to-gluetun.md#external-container-to-gluetun
restart: unless-stopped
cap_add:
- NET_ADMIN
devices:
- /dev/net/tun:/dev/net/tun
volumes:
- ./gluetun:/gluetun
environment:
- VPN_SERVICE_PROVIDER=airvpn
- VPN_TYPE=wireguard
- WIREGUARD_PRIVATE_KEY=xxx
- WIREGUARD_PRESHARED_KEY=xxx
- WIREGUARD_ADDRESSES=xxx
- WIREGUARD_MTU=1320
- SERVER_COUNTRIES=United States
# See https://github.com/qdm12/gluetun-wiki/tree/main/setup#setup
# Timezone for accurate log times
- TZ=America/New_York
# Server list updater
# See https://github.com/qdm12/gluetun-wiki/blob/main/setup/servers.md#update-the-vpn-servers-list
- UPDATER_PERIOD=24h
tailscale:
container_name: tailscale
cap_add:
- NET_ADMIN
- NET_RAW
volumes:
- ./tailscale/var/lib:/var/lib
- ./tailscale/state:/state
- /dev/net/tun:/dev/net/tun
network_mode: "service:gluetun"
restart: unless-stopped
environment:
- TS_HOSTNAME=airvpn-exit-node
- TS_AUTHKEY=xxxxxxxx
- TS_EXTRA_ARGS=--login-server=https://example.com --advertise-exit-node
- TS_NO_LOGS_NO_SUPPORT=true
- TS_STATE_DIR=/state
image: tailscale/tailscale
VPN client in a thin Docker container for multiple VPN providers, written in Go, and using OpenVPN or Wireguard, DNS over TLS, with a few proxy servers built-in. - qdm12/gluetunGitHub
For anyone trying this, make sure you do not have "- TS_USERSPACE=false" in your yaml from previous experimentation. After removing this, it works for me too.
In the documentation (https://tailscale.com/kb/1408/quick-guide-exit-nodes) they say to add sysctl entries, it is possible in docker compose like so:
tailscale:
sysctls:
- net.ipv4.ip_forward=1
- net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding=1___
Learn how to quickly configure exit nodes to route traffic through a specific device in your tailnet, and configure devices to use an exit node.Tailscale
When we were young and first married, my wife and I decided to try a church that we had saw online. The website and name made it seem like it would be alright and more modern thinking. We were wrong.
We pull up and the church building is a double wide trailer, a congregation of about 30 people. The preacher appears to be in his 70s.
He sees that he has guests and singles us out and puts us on the spot to introduce ourselves to whole congregation. He never refers to my wife by her name instead just calling her “Wife”. He prays for us multiple times during the service and bring us up during the sermon. (Still just referring to us as TORFdot0 and wife)
Speaking of the sermon, he begins the sermon talking about the gay democrat agenda and how the gays are ruining God’s institution of marriage and how it will soon be illegal to be married to a woman. This gets an audible sigh from the ladies in the front row.
He also preached to cherish our Bible before the black socialist devil in the white house takes them from us.
He compared the Bible to an old hound dog and started barking for going on two minutes. It’s like a dog because it warns us of things to come.
After what seems like an eternity of a sermon, he invites the kids up to the alter for some “Hallelujah” Candy (it’s the Sunday before Halloween). One child takes a second handful of candy and the elderly pastor chastises him and then bends him over his knee and starts spanking him in front of the congregation.
Needless to say we did not give that church a second visit.
Hi.
Tried to install nix but am stuck with an issue I'm not able to resolve. Whenever I boot the system, it uses approx 5min on the boot-up of Nixos Stage #1 as seen in the picture. After a while it will boot into the system but without a GUI. I've done the installation twice, with different isos to make sure I didn't do it wrong. It only works if I downgrade to nixos 23.11, but if I update(+plasma 6) from there It results in the same problem.
The error is:
kernel: Acpi Error: Aborting method (long string) due to previous error (AE_AML_UNINITIALIZED_ELEMENT)
Have no idea what this error is, and there don't seem to be alot of info on it. Reaching out here to see if anyone is able to help me troubleshoot this, as I would really like to try latest Nixos.
I've had those errors on my system for years. I never thought that they were NixOS specific. I just assumed something to do with a buggy firmware:
Enabled 4 GPEs in block 00 to 1F
ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.GPP2.PTXH.RHUB.POT3._PLD due to previous error (AE_AML_UNINITIALIZED_ELEMENT) (20240322/psparse-529)
[x~20]
ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (domain 0000 [bus 00-ff])$ < /sys/devices/virtual/dmi/id/board_name
ROG STRIX B450-F GAMINGI don't usually see as many prints as you have there, but it's quite a few, and the number seems to vary (grow?) over time. I keep meaning to investigate it, but haven't got around to it.
I think you should keep looking in your logs for other problems. If you can share the full log I'd be happy to take a look.
journalctl | curl -F'file=@-' https://0x0.st and post the link here.
I have the same motherboard! I also rock the AMD 6700 XT graphics card, which I acquired this year, so it would defo leave a sour taste in my mouth if this was the guilty puzzlepiece in the my stack.
Whilst trying to install other .iso's late last night i kept seeing the ACPI errors over and over again, which has me thinking this is a problem with my hardware setup, as you suggested by others.
Journalctl command results in this if thats to any help;
https://0x0.st/Xt2e.txt
and this is lsmod;
lunix@fedora:~$ lsmod | grep amdgpu
amdgpu 17293312 158
amdxcp 12288 1 amdgpu
drm_exec 12288 1 amdgpu
gpu_sched 69632 1 amdgpu
drm_buddy 20480 1 amdgpu
video 81920 2 asus_wmi,amdgpu
i2c_algo_bit 20480 2 igb,amdgpu
drm_suballoc_helper 16384 1 amdgpu
drm_display_helper 253952 1 amdgpu
drm_ttm_helper 12288 1 amdgpu
ttm 118784 2 amdgpu,drm_ttm_helperDid you grep that log file for 'amdgpu'?
I wonder if the error is related to this: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/229108
I'm still using x11 on my system. Maybe try that and see if it works?
Describe the bug After following instructions from https://nixos.wiki/wiki/Sway, the Sway DE starts just as expected. However, when you attempt to start it with WLR_RENDERER=vulkan it fails due to:...GitHub
Can you try booting with acpi=off boot parameter? (Edit the boot commands in the bootloader before it loads the kernel, it's temporary)
Related: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.14/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.html
If that works you can add the option permanently in your configuration.nix
Agreed with others that this is likely a BIOS issue, and it would be good to check for a firmware update first.
In particular, this looks like it might be an issue with the USB port locations described by your BIOS ACPI. Maybe one of the embedded root hubs? You might be able to play with USB settings in the BIOS Config to see if that helps, especially loading default values. I also think it might be possible to blacklist ports from kernel parameters and that could be a good check... but I'm not very familiar with the parameters in recent years and didn't find anything in a quick search.
As a last ditch, you can disable ACPI entirely, but it can/will cause very odd performance and configuration issues along with no power management. (This goes double for portable systems.)
That's definitely a frustrating situation you have, and I very much encourage you to take the path that feels most possible to you!
Before moving on, I would like to point to trying what u/mvirts suggested, disabling ACPI from the grub bootloader. It's easy and great for getting an installer running and working, and sometimes the freshly installed and updated OS whisks the problem away.
But regardless of what you choose, I wish you much luck in your endeavours!
boot.kernelPackages = pkgs.linuxKernel.packages.linux_6_1; to your config (make sure to add it before the closing }) and sudo nixos-rebuild switch . You can also try older versions, like linux_5_19. If it doesn't fix the problem it might be that the ACPI error is a red herring and the problem is something else entirely, in which case it'd be more difficult to diagnose, and I'd recommend just staying on 23.11 for now and only taking the new packages that you need from 24.05. There's a great post on how to do this here: https://discourse.nixos.org/t/installing-multiple-packages-from-unstable-channel-in-configuration-nix/19271/2 (probably also in the docs somewhere but I couldn't find it easily).
This is definitely possible, but many ways lead to Rome. To understand this it’s important to first understand what NixOS releases and channels actually are.NixOS Discourse
If it errors out but it boots, don't worry about it. BIOS bugs will sometimes do that.
If either a newer or older kernel version is available, try that.
ACPI bugs are common and can typically be ignored, but...
without a GUI
how do you know it's even trying to start one? what happens if you try it yourself manually?
In my experience, most hangs with a message about amdgpu loading on screen are caused by an amdgpu issue of some kind. I'd check to see if amdgpu ends up being loaded correctly via lsmod | grep amdgpu and just a general journalctl -b 0 | grep amdgpu to see if there's any obvious failures there. Chances are that even if it's not amdgpu, the real failure is in the journal somewhere.
Could be a wrong setting of hardware.enableRedistributableFirmware (should be true) or the new-ish hardware.amdgpu.initrd.enable (can be either really but either true or false might be more or less reliable on your system).
I ended up booting up bazzite, as I had to have a working computer for today. But ran the commands to see what it resulted in, but not sure what to make of the logs.
Journalctl command results in this;
https://0x0.st/Xt2e.txt
lunix@fedora:~$ lsmod | grep amdgpu
amdgpu 17293312 158
amdxcp 12288 1 amdgpu
drm_exec 12288 1 amdgpu
gpu_sched 69632 1 amdgpu
drm_buddy 20480 1 amdgpu
video 81920 2 asus_wmi,amdgpu
i2c_algo_bit 20480 2 igb,amdgpu
drm_suballoc_helper 16384 1 amdgpu
drm_display_helper 253952 1 amdgpu
drm_ttm_helper 12288 1 amdgpu
ttm 118784 2 amdgpu,drm_ttm_helperOut of a reflex of distrust, I refuse to participate in any kind of loyalty program of the outlet of the large retail store around the corner.
I tell myself that by refusing to join the loyalty program (which basically comes down to scanning an anonymous loyalty card every time I make a purchase), I prevent them from adding my correlations (what products I buy, in what combos, at what time) to their data.
But since I normally pay by card, I guess they can (and do) already do that with my bank account information?
If I would pay with cash, they can still see those correlations per purchase, but they can't track my purchases over time?
Yes they can and, unfortunately, even if you start paying by cash you'll still be tracked to a certain extent. It is extremely difficult to avoid any kind of purchase tracking because everyone from the private company that manages the lot you park in before going inside, to the retailer, to your bank, to the smart screens in the store, to your fucking smart phone (whether by GPS or wifi network identification) is working together to identify and track you.
It's really fucking hard to go incognito theae days.
I think paying in cash cuts down on trackin massively. Can you still be tracked? Yes. But are most stores going through the effort? I don't think so. Depends on the store too, I guess.
Maybe my tin foil hat is getting rusty, but to me it just feels like they'll just move on to the next dude who payed by card instead.
Does that mean that anonymous loyalty cards don't really add any extra tracking capabilities?
Then what is the benefit for retailers? That some people don't use those cards and are thus paying too much?
I'm guessing you're talking about debit cards. From the Canadian Government: yes.
In detail:
Payment terminals can also be built to feed into a retailer’s "customer relationship management" database so that a retailer can track your purchases and tie those to other information about you, such as your email address, if you have given it to them. Financial institutions and payment card network operators could also profile you based on your purchase information.This purchase information could potentially be shared and linked with information held by loyalty card companies, data brokers, or marketers.
If it's possible, then it's a revenue stream, so I assume it'd be done.
Digital payments, how they work, protecting yourselfwww.priv.gc.ca
The American Prospect has some really good recent articles about this. We've entered a new age of personal pricing. Companies have so much data on us that the price that I see when I visit a website is no longer necessarily the price that you see.
https://prospect.org/economy/2024-06-04-one-person-one-price/
Digital surveillance and customer isolation are individualizing the prices we pay.David Dayen (The American Prospect)
If you're walking around with a cellphone turned on with a SIM plugged in or Wi-Fi or Bluetooth turned on (even if not connected to anything), stores still have ways to track you. They won't get your purchase info, but they'd know when you got there, how long you stayed, and maybe where in the store you went (if it's big enough for multiple access points).
Meanwhile, I've just accepted that they'll track me, and I'm fine if they give me a cut. Cashback and such to pay me for my data.
It'd be nice if I got paid for all the ads I see on the internet and outside.
IPhone/android randomize their MAC addresses now to prevent this kind of long term tracking.
Stores will see you walking the store anonymously and be able to create a general customer heatmap, but since this virtual MAC rotates, they won't be able to correlate this to you indivdually long term.
They use randomized MACs there too.
You can set MACs to not randomize for specific WiFi, but by default it's on and random.
Apple platforms handle Wi-Fi privacy using randomized MAC addresses, Wi-Fi sequence number randomization, and SSID.Apple Support
The MAC is generally the fingerprint. Looks like Apple handles this when searching as well:
https://support.apple.com/guide/security/wi-fi-privacy-secb9cb3140c/web
I haven't heard of anything else besides MAC being broadcast during the searching phase. Can you give an example or technical term?
Apple platforms handle Wi-Fi privacy using randomized MAC addresses, Wi-Fi sequence number randomization, and SSID.Apple Support
Whenever wifi is enabled, your device is sending out probe request frames, which includes your list of preferred networks/networks you've connected to before.
Yes, a good bit of stores do. I pay in cash generally, and I don't tie my email to my bank account. The nice thing with paying cash is you have a better idea of how much money your spending too.
But as some other users mentioned, some stores have these camera's in the parking lot that track your license plate. Generally park in a way that it cant see it when you enter or leave.
Depends on the store.
Your non chain store that has a loyalty program, probably doesn't have the interest or capital to pay some third party to manage the data collection and analysis to try to direct market things to you.
Worked at a co-op grocery store for a while. The "owners" could use their owner number to keep track of their purchases to count towards their patronage refund amount and it also allowed some limited ability to look at full transaction information to deal with misrings, returns without recipts, etc. in the decade that I worked there, there was no effort or interest (even though the people running the coop at the highest level were definitely "business goober" types) to try to use the info for direct marketing or to sell to a data broker.
You do consent often enough.
At least in Germany, there are at least two companies (Schufa and Experian) who will analyze your account data/money transfers to calculate a score.
Technically, this is legal because they claim to have a legitimate interest in the data and you do have to tick a checkbox.
So quite a few lemmy clients have a tagging feature for users. I use it quite constantly because I like to remember who I'm talking to. Though for some I just use it for descriptors. A few of you are listed as stubborn, a few of you are listed as don't engage, a few are Nice, or helpful, or Pug. I believe one of you is just listed as fish guy(don't remember why).
How do you all use your tagging system, if you do at all?
I think I misunderstood what you meant by user tag. I interpreted it as a method for me to assign tags to people that only I would be able to see.
For example, if I were to tag you as "A hoopy frood", I would see that next time we happened to interact out of the blue, so I'd get a rough outline of who you are to me. Not sure how such a mechanism would be implemented.
Mainly if I feel they're some kind of troll on political discussions (i.e. the war in Gaza). I usually go back and forth a few times but if I feel like they're intentionally sidestepping the issue to make some kind of mundane point I tag them as such.
I like you're idea of tagging the nice users though. I think I might start doing that.
Also, what's pug mean?
I use tagging for sorting media that falls into multiple categories and defies normal hierarchical methods. I didn’t know about tagging users on Lemmy though, but I don’t know that I honestly will use it ever. You’re all just random people talking into the void, hell, half (or more) of the people here may very well be bots, I don’t know. The idea of tagging people based on past interactions seems a bit weird to me I guess (not that I don’t see uses for tagging for organization in general).
Edit: actually, I don’t even know if user tags are supported by Voyager, the main app I use to access lemmy. So, that too.
I tag people that don't converse in good faith. So there's people who attempt to misuse the Socratic method to derail any conversation. People who are just blatantly bigoted and aren't open to other perspectives. A tag helps me from getting sucked in by an interesting question.
And there's people who aren't necessarily good faith/bad faith. Like people I suspect are just way over on the Spectrum to where they will take everything very literally and no philosophical or theoretical conversation will go anywhere with them. I don't avoid conversation with these types of people, necessarily, but I might approach conversation differently.
Auf YouTube findest du die angesagtesten Videos und Tracks. Außerdem kannst du eigene Inhalte hochladen und mit Freunden oder gleich der ganzen Welt teilen.youtube.com
And although I am eagerly waiting for manufacturers like AudioRealism, d16, GForce Software, Sugar Bytes or Moog Music (among others) to come forward with Linu…Amadeus Paulussen
I once got a reddit DM from a guy offering to be my sugar daddy. All I had to do was give up family, friends, hobbies, career, move in with him and have his babies. He assured me I would want for nothing. I turned him down, but I was just a simple "yes" away from being so wealthy and happy. He was also highly complimentary of my looks, despite never seeing even a photo of me, so I know he wasn't shallow.
Edit: ok, that's all a lie. I got like 6 DMs like this. And that's when I turned direct messaging off for my reddit account.
Well, he didn't assure me he was 6 foot or taller, ofc. Us ladies be wanting our 6-6-6 men.
Six feet or taller, six-pack abs, six-figure salary or GTFO.
/s
In 2010 I built a new computer. I was interested in bitcoin from a “this is technically neat” category. I set it up and was able to mine dozens of coins per day.
I did. It was all set up and working. But it generated a lot of heat in my upstairs So. Cal. Apartment. So I stopped. Just deleted the coins because they were pretty worthless then.
I don’t get too upset though because I never would have held them to $50k each. I would have sold them for a buck each.
But I “could have” if it wasn’t so hot out. ;)
Or been unable to pay his bills and been forced to sell at 4k / coin.
Crypto's too volatile to put that much risk into it, if you ask me.
Same. I bought some 70 bitcoins for 50€ when I first heard of it. Kept mining on a radeon 9770 or something at about 1BTC or 5€ per week. Electricity was included in my rent then, but I stopped because fan noise.
I lost a bunch on mtgox. Cashed out for a down payment on a house way too early (2016). I'd be rich if I had hodled.
My friend told me about Bitcoin when it was about $8 per coin. I was young and making some extra cash from working and not really buying too much stuff so I could have easily tossed down $100 on some crypto and let it ride.
The very next time I even bothered paying attention to crypto was when Bitcoin shot up to 78k from like 60k.
So yeah, I feel this lol.
Bitcoin showed up on my radar when they were worth pennies, but I was young and had no way to buy them and didn't have a computer that could really mine them. Once I had the means to buy, I had no money. By the time I had a little extra money, they were already in the thousands.
Same story with Tesla. They weren't public when they popped up on my radar, and when they made their IPO I had no money to invest.
I had the idea to offload machine learning to GPUs back in the early 00's. I was working for a company doing number plate recognition back then, so I was even in a position to act on my idea... but my boss thought I was nuts.
I'm not sure how much money I would have made, but it's got to be better than this!
Had the ability to buy in on Google right after they went public - passed on it
Had the ability to buy in on Apple in the mid 1990s -passed
Had the ability to buy bitcoin at $5 a coin, could have put in $5k at the time -passed
Had the ability to buy in on Amazon shortly after they went public -passed
Ebay -passed
Starting to see a trend?
I shall wear this badge with honor
inscription on badge "I'm a Moron"
One parent had a growing business when I was super young, they brought home well into the 6 figures. However two things happened 1: the internet started getting bigger so that started to hurt their business and 2: the 2008 housing crash happened and for a business that worked with banks on mortgages (I was too young to fully understand what the business did) it was fatal. Then we were dirt poor! The family never really recovered but after many years we did manage to get on our feet, then a parent died and shit went down hill again lmao.
I could've grown up a rich kid, instead I grew up with a family oats pot for meals. Though I'm probably a healthier grounded human for it.
2: the 2008 housing crash happened
My dad's 50 year-old roofing business never fully recovered either, which is partly why I hate our government and how it works for the wealthy.
He now drives for DoorDash, at age 80, using my car. The alternative is starvation.
Well, isn't it exciting? We may just witness a second crash! /S
But for real, it's getting really bad again, it doesn't seem sustainable and I honestly expected something to crack by now, but it hasn't. The longer it gets delayed the worse it's gonna be
There will be, no doubt.
The thing with crypto is to just add small amounts over time, so when those spikes happen you can take advantage. It's pointless to try and time it.
Idk how well this would actually sell but years ago in my early 20s, I came up with the idea for a beer coozie for 40oz bottles.
40s are great if you are poor and want just enough of a buzz but unless you chug them, they get warm halfway through. Which is also why 12oz cans/bottles are probably also more appealing.
Just a big ass coozie to keep your Bud Ice cold in a Sunday afternoon of porch drinking.
Didn't get "rich" per se, but I got in on dogecoin when it was at a penny, missed the peak, and ended up selling in the 30 cent range. I also picked up a ton of oil stocks in March 2020 when it bottomed out that I later sold for more than 15x their original value.
The irony is that I invested in dogecoin because Robbing Hood locked down investments into Gamestop. I didn't realize that would be such a lucky development at the time.
Those investments paid off my student loans and got me a down payment on a condo. I still have five-figures in my investment account that I'm growing into early retirement. My current focus is gambling stocks, in large part because every election year it seems like there's a smattering of states legalizing it. (MO and NE have it on the ballot for this year.)
Not fuck you money or 'rich', but life-changing.
I was ready to drop $2,000 on AMD stock when it was $3 a share. Someone talked me out of it.
While it wouldn't have made me "rich", I'd be much better off than I am now.
You shouldn't regret not gambling $2000 just because you saw it would've worked out.
... you should regret not gambling $200, "because fuck it." If you're really worried about any greedy investment, just lower the stakes.
I bought some GameStop when it was $10 but chickened out and sold it a few days before it went to like $420 a share cuz I thought I was being baited by wallstreetbetters. I only later found out a close friend of mine who is a generally responsible investor was heavily in that and sold at like $200~ to pay off all his medical debt. He's not rich either, but financially better off than before that happened.
I don't mess with stocks now.
Yeah I am so pissed about this too.
I had the money I was trying to convince my mum for months that I give her 100 dollars and she buys me a one time use card from the post office. She was convinced they could keep scamming more money from it somehow.
Today it's still a sore topic when I visit her.
Millions and millions lost because my mum doesn't know how a one time use card works
Nearly 30 years ago, I worked for a tiny li'l anti-virus software company that got acquired by one of the big boys, and everyone's performance-based options they were holding were suddenly worth a lot. Being hungry for career growth at the time, I'd left the company and forfeited those options. Less than 6 months later, they announced the sale of the company.
My options woulda been worth a few million at the time, maybe double that in today's money. Importantly, it would've set me up with a nice house, car, etc, without any debt, in my early 20s.
Not rich, but certainly comfortable.
Here in Australia, it's costing our family of five about $100k a year to live, excluding our mortgage. 4% return ($80K) is conservatively realistic here (for low risk investment), and still isn't enough.
Like I said, while it would've set me up with a house and no debt, I'd still have to work to pay for the cost of living.
I bought 3000 bitcoin back in the day when it was valued at about 91 cents. Fell on hard times and so did a very good friend of mine, so I sold most of it to help pay our bills. We used to mine bitcoin too for a while and got 1 a day each, but again-- had to sell it off to pay the bills. Crazy times but I'm okay with it-- I never liked the stress that came with Googling "BTC value" every few hours.
I never hear the end of it from friends/family members and it's really annoying, especially because they all love to omit the fact that I didn't sell out of greed, I sold out of necessity for myself and my friend. But the moment I tell them that at least I got a LOT out of my initial $3000 investment while they completely slept on Bitcoin, they get all bitter like I went too far. It's very annoying.
Now I'm super poor-- like the poorest I've ever been as an adult. But I'm still relatively privileged so I can't really be bitter.
Edit: Plus, I gave the last few bitcoin I had to someone I trust very much and they just insist on holding onto them, with the goal of someday being able to sell them for an amount that could give rise to an early retirement for both of us. If it happens, great. If not, I'm in the same position I'm in now so it's okay.
Not super rich, but we'd be doing substantially better financially if this went differently.
The year: 2020. I was playing with the stock market and decided to buy 10,000 shares of the cheapest stock, just because it was funny to say I had 10k shares in anything. It cost about $800.
A couple of months later, lo and behold, my $800 was worth about $5000! "Holy shit," I said, "I made money on penny stocks!" I promptly sold all of it.
Several months later, I check on it again. The company has announced new technology and its share price has skyrocketed, from a few cents per stock to $25. I could have made $250k, but instead made $5k.
My condolences, that must sting.
Out of curiosity, what was the name of the company?
Just a one off gamble aided by a cocktail of ADHD impulsiveness, COVID anxiety, and the stress of living in a 5th wheel with three cats, a dog, and my wife. We did some weird shit.
We were living with family and we had no rent/mortgage for a few months. We live in a high cost of living area, so not having that payment means having an extra $2k+ per month. I miss that part but not much else.
I bought Bitcoin in highschool. Not much, though, because it was just a neat concept. There was no reason it would actually skyrocket in value (still isn't).
I had a teacher ask me for help investing in it, too. There was another guy in Canada that turned that exact situation into a nice ponzi scheme.
I mined one Bitcoin back in college with my home computer. Now, I did sell it for a lot of money and I'm not complaining, don't misunderstand, but hoo boy. If I mined more? Goodness.
It took like a week or more to get. I was living in a bonus room with basically no air conditioning at the time, just an okay at best window unit. This was during the summer. My room got miserable lmao. And I couldn't use my computer for anything, especially not gaming. So when I finally got my payout and went to see how much it was worth it felt stupid to keep going. It was worth like 10 bucks at the time. Pretty much nowhere took them either. I think one of the few things you could buy was alpaca wool socks or something.
As an aside, I think the only thing I ever directly bought with them was a Windows 10 key from r/MicrosoftSoftwareSwap that stopped working. I believe because the user sold it again to someone else. I think I got that for $20 which was a better bargain but long term that would've been like $200 at least because of how much more Bitcoin is worth. The insane volatility of it is stressful and I'm happy to not have any crypto "investments" today.
James Howells. Quite a sad story. For those unaware, I'll give you the short version:
In 2013, Howells mined close to 8,000 BTC and saved his private keys (which is like a password to get access to your BTC) to his laptop's hard drive. Months later he absent-mindedly throws it in the trash. Next morning he realizes what he's done and tries going to the local garbage dump to search for it. He grew obsessed with finding the hard drive. It got to the point where his wife left him and took the kids with her. To this day he's still trying to get his local government to give him permission to dig through the city's garbage dump.
::: spoiler Semi-rant
His plan to retrieve his lost crypto was doomed from the start. When the garbage truck came to pick up his garbage, it had its own trash compactor inside, which would have crushed the hard drive to bits, meaning the hard drive most likely died before it even got to the landfill. And even if the HDD wasn't destroyed, the data on it would have likely been corrupted after sitting in garbage for 10+ years. And even if they managed to recover the data, if he tried to sell any of his BTC it would crash the market. He should have just cut his losses from the beginning and spent more time with his wife and kids. Now, this fool's errand to retrieve the (likely-dead) hard drive will be his legacy.
:::
In 2009 I had 13k AMD shares at an average cost basis of $2.12.
I sold them in 2011 for ~$8/share.
Those shares are worth around $1.5M today.
35 Bitcoins back when they were $3/coin.
I bought some camera equipment off of some short-lived Bitcoin eBay clone, and decided my credit card was easier.
Did a little bit of buying/selling since for a mild profit, before swearing off all Blockchain tech as useless.
I played the stock market game in grade school and noticed this one stock, BRKHA that was moving thousands of dollars daily (and was occasionally dipping into the hundreds). Considering the others would only move a fraction of a dollar daily it was a goal to get one share for the game. I did and ended up winning.
I should have tried to pressure my parents into at least one share. By the time I was 18 it would have been worth 70k, and these days it's up to.. Nearly 700k per share.
I would've likely sold it on my 18th birthday and been able to languish a bit longer than I did. All in all it wouldn't have been worth doing.
Back in 1988 I had a school project with a few people, one of whom came from a wealthy family. The project was regarding the stock market, and each team was given a certain amount of imaginary money to invest, to see who would win out at the end of the semester. My friend with the wealthy family came back with a recommendation from his father, of course, and we won the contest easily.
The recommendation? Put all our funds into Berkshire Hathaway.
I had the golden goose egg right in front of me and never invested a dime.
Does anyone know if there are any companies/organizations that offer the possibility to sail the Atlantic by boat as a passenger (so not as a (more or less) experienced crew member). Are there any? Or announced plans or something like that?
(I'm not talking about being a passenger on a large cargo ship. I'm curious about the possibility to cross the Atlantic with a low carbon footprint).
Findacrew.net - Typically private boat owners looking for a hand on crossings. No experience might make this a bit of a push and I havent used it for about 10 years so...
A better chance might be to try and get ahold of the merchant navy.
Plenty of big ships that take a volunteer crew, especially for ship delivery. They can be picky about who they make shipmates, so dont sound fucking useless if you contact someone. Competition to be crew can get fierce.
Depending where you are, most seem to do the business on Facebook.
Hear me out. The thing with cruise ships is that they sometimes relocate from North America to Europe operations and vis versa. Those cruises don't get tourists because the whole point of a cruise is to visit different places, no one wants that trip. But the relocation is going to happen anyway, so they sell tickets super cheap (and it's stripped of entertainment like comedians, shows, etc). And because it's going to happen anyway, you're not exactly adding to any carbon footprint. You'd have to Google what exactly they're called.
But I get you if you want to sail. That does exist too.
For the discussion we're having here, planes generally don't relocate for the sake of relocating. If they do, then you don't want to spend the time loading passengers/bags at a terminal. You just want to take off, land, and skip the rest. Plus for a plane any weight is quite a cost.
If you are talking about a normal commercial flight, then you flying is normal demand.
If you are looking to make the crossing on a sailboat under 50', there are a few hitchhiker facebook groups that are pretty active. Maybe start in the FBG 'All Things Sailing" and move on from there.
Source: am fulltime liveaboard crusier
Looks like the main options are the things you've already ruled-out:
Maybe you can find a "tall ship" that's big enough to have passive passengers (example), or pay the small boat to bring a higher ratio of paid crew to let the passengers sleep.
Sail USA To England on this magnificnet Atlantic Ocean crossing on board a racing yacht. No experience necessary, all tuition given on board.Another World Adventures
Thanks. The tall ships look amazing.
I don't understand why there arent more commercial options around. Aren't there armies of rich tourists and digital nomads struggling with their CO2 footprints?
Wouldnt it be possible to have WiFi on such tall ships? Wouldnt it be possible for people to work online for some weeks?
It might be a trope by now, but when you mention "rich tourists and digital nomads"... have you read For The Win?
Like, when Cory Doctorow considers this question, his character (an archetype of the subcultures you mention, from nearly fifteen years ago, voiced by the most cyberpunk author you ever read) chooses a cargo ship.
Royal Caribbean has a couple of one way routes from the us to Europe.
Some shipping companies will also rent cabin space for civilians to cross the atlantic.
From what I understand, a big part of what's happening with Boeing, is that Boeing is run by Business person who want to maximize return of stock-owner rather than by people wanting to make a good product. The gained flexibility/nicer budget from massive sub-contracting led to "loss of knowledge", and cutting-down quality control steps which "never catch anything" led to issue being missed-out.
Do you think that MBA program will take this reality into account ? or would they keep focusing on maximizing short-term profit even if it jeopardize the company's future ?
Absolutely not.
If they learn anything from this, it will be to better find the boundaries of what kind of grift they can or can't get away with. The criminals will get smarter and barely a slap on the wrist. Worst case scenario, an entirely new flock of shitbirds will replace them and keep doing the same or worse.
As long as no one at the top goes to jail or completely personally bankrupt, there is 0 incentive for the system to change in the slightest.
IMHO everyone is entirely missing the point pointing their finger at Boeing.
The main issue is the FAA and how it failed to control Boeing. It's obvious a business will try to sacrifice safety for money. But there should be check and balances. Someone making sure a business doesn't do that.
The FAA let Boeing supervise itself.
Just to be clear some of the higher up at Boeing are criminals but so is the cop that told him he could police himself.
And now we have a former McKinsey consultant as DOT Sec.
During his term we had aircraft doors coning off midflight, a catastrophic train wreck in Ohio that polluted into New England, a ship tear down a major highway bridge, etc.
Def presidential material.
This is somewhat of a mischaracterization of how this all shakes out/is taught/is perceived even though I get why it seems that way.
No one tells people “sacrifice the company for short term gains.” That’s not actually what people are taught. The problem is we have a misaligned incentive system that rewards that behavior more than it punishes it and little to incentive to play the long game other than “make sure it doesn’t completely crumble under your watch.” So eventually people think they know what good leadership looks like (rapid expansion/rapid cost cutting/fat and happy shareholders with a C-suite reaping fat stacks as a result). All while they play hot potato with a company that is being redlined which may or may not be able to take the strain.
The issue is longterm plays/considerations are disincentivized rather than straight up demonized.
Sadly you see this at all levels of companies.
I've seen it in IT for 30+ years (Google is a great example): new projects/changes make you visible to upper management, but if you prevent failures/outages no one cares.
Now, have an actual outage and fix it, you're a hero.
So, don't prevent outages, but note the issues privately, develop mitigation plans, so when the outage occurs you're the hero. That's the lesson anyway.
I feel like it is a story as old as time and not isolated to Boeing. I am pretty sure all companies that are publicly traded have a legal obligation to maximize stockholder return, it's why most companies go to shit eventually. They may be able to frame making better decisions as an investment into future returns, but they are legally obligated to maximize returns. Boeing just did it while also being propped up by federal contracts where holding them accountable for the decline in quality and changing vendors was above everyone's pay grade. End stage capitalism combined with good old boy government contracts = astronauts stuck on the space station.
Disclaimer: I am in no way educated in business or have any experience. I am just stating my opinion. Back on the site we don't speak of, usually a generic not relevant comment like this one just meant to join the conversation usually got buried with something relevant ending up at the top. Here it is one of a few comments so I feel obligated to point out that I am just talking out my ass. Remember, reddit went to shit when it became publicly traded and they began trying to maximize shareholder profit, unlike boeing who is propped up by the government, we just left.
There are a lot of examples recently of respected legacy companies being turned into hollow husks of their former selves (or even going out of business entirely) due to finance bros. Sears, Paramount, Toys R Us, Warner Bros, Red Lobster, Twitter, Reddit (ok maybe stretching the definition of "respected"), and now Boeing, among many, many others.
Will it change anything among that class of people? Probably not. The spectre of Jack Welch still looms large over the business world, incentivizing short-term slash-and-burn flash over long-term productive smolder. The type of person who's inclined toward this kind of con will still pursue it, and there are enough people of low scruples who will get the dollar signs in their eyes.
But with any luck, it will take the luster off enough that people will stop playing along; and they'll run out of money sooner or later.
It's already starting to happen. The Onion was bought back from private equity earlier this summer, and the new owners are taking a lot of steps that no PE would ever consider; essentially they're just looking to stay afloat, not trying to cancerously pursue unchecked growth.
If you want another good example of positive 'capitalism' check out Sam Reich and Dropout.
His father is Robert Reich (Former Secretary of Labor).
Sam is expanding Dropout at a sustainable rate. since its founding it's had only one or 2 price hikes bringing the cost from like 3.99 to 5.99.
And they weren't just arbitrary hikes. We got a lot of new content as a result.
He takes care of his employees. And more importantly he cares about his employees as people.
You know what's most ironic, those executives decisions actually endangered their own lives. Who's a group of people typically flying quite frequently? Upper management. And it's more likely than not to be on a Boeing.
Imagine being so focused on shareholder value that you risk your life for it.
Damn, that's a good point.
Maybe some poor maintenance needs to be done on one of their private planes. Oh, yea, that's right, they fly private, and I bet those are properly maintained and well-checked.
Boeing Business Jets (BBJ) brings the best of commercial aviation into the realm of private air travel. Step abroad an experience what it means to fly without compromises.Boeing Business Jets
hahahahahahaahahaha
no
Edit: Rather than being full snark (it was a genuinely funny question though), I'll give a more thoughtful answer. The reason the answer is no, is because MBAs tend to attract narcissistic sociopaths. And the first thing they do in this situation, is blame someone else, not the degree, but the specific person.
"If only he was a better MBA he would have kept the company focused on its core values". That sort of thing.
The thing a degree that's held by the majority of Narcissists and Sociopaths in the world absolutely won't do, is inflect.
This was literally an "Ask Lemmy" question, which pulls on individual personal experience for responses, so I'm not sure what else you would have been expecting.
I work with MBAs all day every day. Nonstop. They're the vast majority of my touchpoints as a lifelong software engineer/DBA that manages several teams. I've been in the industry for 25+ years and have worked for multiple large (enterprise tier) medium, and small (startup) companies across multiple states including owning my own consulting company and interfaced directly with C-types that held nothing but MBAs.
So, not uninformed, but it is anecdotal. In the sense that this matches my life experience for 25+ years of working closely with MBA types on hundreds of projects during that time. Someone else might have different experiences. But I'm here answering their question so I'm going to talk about my experiences.
There's plenty of MBA holders that are pragmatic and "normal". However, at the top level, MBAs either attract, or turn people into narcissistic sociopaths, because the majority of narcissistic sociopaths I know and have worked with, hold MBAs.
Take from that what you will.
Edit: Apparently he took away a downvote. Getting a sneaking suspicion this guy might have an MBA. 😀 Not sure why you're downvoting my life experiences, but sure guy. You win.
I'm a recent MBA grad and I can attest that stuff like this was an important part of the curriculum re: sustainable growth. Cutting corners, focusing on short term profits is always a dead end. When leaders get lazy and don't drive a culture that is aligned with the company's mission, values, and obligations, decay is inevitable. The Boeing board of directors is as complicit in all of this as their executives are.
I don't necessarily believe you have to have deep expertise in a given field to govern a business in said field. Often it's even an advantage to come in with a fresh set of eyes. But you need to at least RESPECT that field and its experts and be forthright about taking responsibility when you take action intended to eliminate waste. If the only metric you are using is revenue, or operating profit, or whatever, you are creating an organization that is incentivized to maximize those at the expense of other, core-business-critical factors. If you're making something inconsequential, by all means take those risks and race to the bottom. But when people's lives are at stake, you need to have reverence for what your business actually does.
You've got the wrong idea about what the shareholders prioritize. They got sued by the shareholders for lying about being committed to safety and instead maximizing short term profits.
https://www.reuters.com/legal/boeing-is-sued-by-shareholders-following-max-9-blowout-2024-01-31/
Shareholders seek to maximize profits. If that includes a lawsuit to squeeze out even more investments, then why not?
They never bothered to check if Boeing did what they had to do security wise. Only once it threatened their profits they sprang into action.
Exactly how are you supposed to check that a company you own shares in does what it's supposed to? You're not allowed into the factory. You're not allowed to see any reports other than what they already publish.
You have to take the word of the management.
👀 BrowserPub: A browser for debugging #ActivityPub and the ⁂fediverseBrowserPub · A browser for debugging ActivityPub and the fediverse
Explore the open social web through the lens of ActivityPub and the fediverse.browser.pub
I want to be able to copy text to a "Copy Box".
In early RTS you could bind units to number keys 1 through 10 by pressing Ctrl + # and then # to recall that selection.
I want to be able to have Multiple Copy & Paste boxes like Copy 1, Copy 2, Paste 3
Is there anything like this on Wayland already?
I found a solution today using Fcitx, the clipboard addon, and the default shortcut Ctrl+semicolon. However, it works more like a history that pushes each older item down, rather than 10 separately accessible boxes. It seems as though it will work with the use case you described.
Note 2: I have no idea how well Fcitx is supported in Wayland.
Some Lemmy user at one point had asked about a "multi-paste" feature, if there was a way to use keyboard shortcuts to display multiple clipboard items and copy/paste them out at will (this user mentioned similar to RTS games they like to play). ~~If someone can find that post, can you notify them and direct them here, please? I'm having trouble locating it but I recollect that it was within the last 3 months.~~ Edit: I found the post!
Somehow this was stuck in my mind when I accidentally pressed a keyboard shortcut, that showed my last 5 copied items. This isn't exactly what the user was looking for but I thought I'd publicize it here.
If you use Fcitx (because you need multi-language input) from the fcitx5 packages, then you may already have installed the clipboard add-on. You can use fcitx with just one keyboard layout. By default, it's activated by Ctrl+semicolon and shows the 5 last entries, but the number can be configured.
Clearly a government conspiracy because they want to know what porn "Dan" watches.
These sneaky motherfuckers. Totally out to take Dan down.
Found the post, for some reason I had a lot of trouble finding it when I was looking around before posting.
@electricprism@lemmy.ml maybe this will help you as it is Linux distro-agnostic. I have not tested on Wayland, though. For good measure I'll add a comment on the original post.
I hope this could help anyone else out who can take advantage of this feature, or turn it off if they are worried about the feds after them.
Copy 1 through 10, Paste 1 through 10
I want to be able to copy text to a "Copy Box".In early RTS you could bind units to number keys 1 through 10 by pressing Ctrl + # and then # to recall that selection.
I want to be able to have Multiple Copy & Paste boxes like Copy 1, Copy 2, Paste 3
Is there anything like this on Wayland already?
Auf YouTube findest du die angesagtesten Videos und Tracks. Außerdem kannst du eigene Inhalte hochladen und mit Freunden oder gleich der ganzen Welt teilen.www.youtube.com
escort missions
Clark Kent must really have not made much money as a reporter if he had to walk the streets at night too
Gotta be Seven Samurai 20xx
Christmas Day, we just got a PS1 years after everyone else. My brother and I are ecstatic to play. My mum and sister are smiling at our reaction, since they went to the game store and asked the guy what a good game would be to play.
Formula One '98. We played a lap each, and then turned off the console. I can still recall the commentary "it looks like he's stuck in the kitty litter!"
*hands shake*
I looked up some gameplay on YouTube and it doesn't look that bad. A bit slow but that's all
What was so bad about it to counterweigh the "wowwwww it's 3d !!!11!" effect ?
just a super boring game for two 9 year olds to play. It would be like if she got us a golf game.
Adult me would probably really enjoy both games
As a former 9yo I would have liked a Formula One game
Different strokes for different folks
Different strokes for different folks
That's doubly true for the golf game.
it doesn't drive. It stays parked at the start. You're not really racing it.
Simply put, the game was unfinished, it didn't actually have any gameplay.
Who Framed Roger Rabbit on NES. Ghostbusters was more disappointing, but I've at least kinda figured out how to play it over my lifetime. WFRR I'm clueless on. I think it's some kind of point and click, but I'm not really sure. There's a part where you have to call a real life telephone number to progress.
Pretty accurate depictionsof what it feels like to play these games.
😄 The phone call was just to get some simple bonus tips, nothing really necessary.
What killed me was, to swap items, you hold Select and use the arrow keys. It's soooo unintuitive!
Finally, I know what the phone call does!
Maybe I've been too hard on Roger Rabbit NES....
By the time I got around to playing it, the number was deprecated and I definitely wasn't figuring out how to actually beat it! I guess I just assumed it gated me from the end, when it was probably some other esoteric thing.
Im sure there are games that wouldnt even work so i technically didnt even play them but ill list a couple of games that i tried playing, hated, and uninstalled almost immediately
They both had the same problem.
Days gone and Red Dead Redemption 2.
I tried to force myself into enjoying rdr2 because it was supposedly that good. For the first few hours i kept asking myself when does the game start? When do i actually get to play?
Days gone i only made it maybe an hour before i quit and uninstalled.
I want to play a game not watch an interactive movie
RDR2 is very much not for everybody. It is intentionally tedious. It's the kind of game you sit down and play for at least 2-3 hours every time you play it because that's just how long it takes to get anything done. You aren't fast traveling. You aren't doing things instantaneously in a menu. Your time as a human being is an in-game resource. If you're in the middle of nowhere and your horse dies, a ton of your shit was being carried in the saddle; you need to walk your ass to the nearest town lugging that saddle, vulnerable to wild animals and robbers. It's a game about getting things done with your own two hands at the turn of the century when that was becoming much less valued. It's a game about subsistence. You could have an easier, more prosperous life, but at what cost? At whose cost? It's a game about nature and living in a natural world as a natural being, criticizing the transition into industrial exploitation of our fellow natural world and natural animals, including natural humans. It's not a rootin' tootin' spaghetti western adventure; it's an interactive classic American novel that can occasionally have funny or fun moments depending on your tastes. I fully understand that it's wasn't a game that you or millions of other people enjoyed, but I think it's wholly unjust to label it a "bad" game for that. It did exactly what it set out to do, and evoked impactful emotion in sharing its message as intended for the people who wanted to be open to it. It's successful art, but not all art is for you and not all art is for me. You may have gone in with the wrong expectations for it. I think it really sucks that every rockstar game since the early 2000s seems to be marketed as "GTA but __" because the Red Dead games and LA Noire are very much _not GTA. They're 3rd person open worlds with similar engines, but that's where the similarities end.
If you ever try it again, come in with a similar mindset to wanting to sit down and watch The Godfather, not The Avengers. There's a lot to get out of it if you just focus on the story and the characters and the beautiful setting. Enjoy the honest work, and lament the shootouts and heists.
There were parts of RDR2 that I adored and parts I loathed. Riding around exploring, hunting, and discovering the environment was a joy. I put a ton of hours into the game just doing that.
The quests were a nightmare to me. Ride to location A to get the quest. Ride to location B to start the quest. Ride to location C as part of the quest and if you dare to wander off the exact route or try an innovative solution and you FAIL
I'd recommend trying RDR1 before RDR2, but then again that might make you hate the tutorial section RDR2 had even more lol
RDR2 is excellent, but it almost feels like it's trying too hard. RDR1 was just a classic IMO, literally revolutionary for its time. I thought it would be just GTA with horses but honestly it felt so much more than that, they completely nailed the atmosphere and everything else about it. I still play RDR1 sometimes these days.
I really liked Midnight Suns 🙁
I got to play video games with spider man and be in a book club with Captain marvel.
The deck building was pretty good. I wanted more cards and more excuses to use more heroes.
The fact that there's no miss chance on attacks is subtle but a real improvement over the genre standard. And using the environment was a lot of fun, and very genre appropriate.
Mega Traveller 2. Buggy janky story. Bad combat. Character creation that includes all the skills from the pen and paper game but only about 10% of them actually do anything in game.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/MegaTraveller_2:_Quest_for_the_Ancients
I wouldn't say worst, but maybe greatest difference in expectation vs reality - "My Time at Portia".
Cutscenes and voice acting were janky. The UI felt like it was originally an MMO and feels odd for a single player game. The gameplay loop felt tedious and seemed to disrespect the player's time.
Maybe I needed to give it more time, but for a game that I thought had generally good/great reviews, it wasn't clicking for me.
Hard as hell, and unfair. Plenty of jumps powered by seemingly inconsistent mechanics that need to be done perfectly, otherwise instant death.
Played it recently as an adult after beating some other retro games from my childhood for the first time. In Lion King, I made it one level further and put the game down again...to level 3.
Well, I had gotten to Level 3 as a kid, but I was able to clear the Ostrich Run in Level 2 much more consistently after some practice. It was a fluke as a kid.
The game has 10 levels.
the main story was maybe a total of 4 hours
You must have been amazing at it, because it was certainly more like 20 for me, not counting branching missions. (The internet says it's around 25ish)
it was just buggy as fuck with the AI pathfinding being incredibly bad and somehow worse than the predecessors
I think you're wearing some rose tinted goggles about Red Alert (and some solid black ones for the first game). Pathfinding in Tiberium Dawn was so terrible that it was part of the balance of the game, when they tried to fix it for the remaster, they found it horribly unbalanced the game in favor of GDI, so they decided not to fix it. Pathfinding was pretty shit in Tiberian Sun, but it was much worse before.
or the main other RTSs of the time.
Yeah, StarCraft was better but Total annihilation was much worse than Tiberian Sun in places where there was any terrain.
TA is much better now, but it has 25 years of mods going for it.
Pandora: First Contact, supposed spiritual successor to Sid Meier Alpha Centuari
Seconded. I repressed all memories of this game until now.
The Bible Game. It’s a game that was originally released on the GBC or GBA; I honestly can’t even remember which… I downloaded a ROM pack for my retropie and discovered it hidden inside. My buddy and I got drunk one evening, and decided to boot it up for shiggles.
It has you running around trying to answer bible verse questions to get keys from demons. It’s the single most boring and unintuitive game I’ve played. It also blatantly got several of the Bible verses wrong. We looked it up online, and there’s also a version that was on the Xbox, but it apparently had wildly different gameplay and was more like a game show, where the players answered trivia questions.
Super Noah's Ark is on my rg35xx. It's amazing.
My cousin had a couple Bible themed NES games. Spiritual Warfare seemed decent.
There used to be a store called Heaven & Earth that sold all kinds of Christian stuff for Sunday school teachers or whatever plus books, cheap Bible toys, etc. She bought it there.
Auf YouTube findest du die angesagtesten Videos und Tracks. Außerdem kannst du eigene Inhalte hochladen und mit Freunden oder gleich der ganzen Welt teilen.www.youtube.com
The 4th game i made public
Its a mobile game where you have to find 4 "hidden" painted eggs. It was supposed to respawn the eggs in different spots, but i dont think i ever tested the game so i didnt know it didnt work.
There is also a score that doesnt work and a high score that cant go past 40
This is the game i spent the least time or effort making, copying everything from the last game i made, but changing the textures and modifying the part of the spawner of the collectables where they spawn randomly on the screen to appear at one out of a set of positions
I used to love Simpsons Wrestling, because I didn’t know any better. I think I was too young to really grasp the concept of a “bad game” yet.
Its still fun to spin up in a nostalgic sort of way.
I agree with everything. I hated RE5 at first but it grew on me after a while. With mods of course. It has too many small annoyances for me to fully enjoy it vanilla. Just hell to the no.
RE6 is just a badly designed game:
On the other hand, it was rather amusing seeing Leon fucking wrestle-slam a zombie like he's in the WWE. Lol.
Edit: Added to a clause to make the follow-up point clear(er).
I think that's maybe a bit harsh compared to a lot of the games mentioned here.
For sure - by "looking at it through the lens of relativity" I guess I failed to specify what I was holding it relative to - where my brain's at W1 as a starting point, and the quality of W2 and W3... Relative to other trilogies that actually did well, Witcher's starting point is hot trash. Like, a game that bad doesn't generally go on to have good sequels, but the degree of improvement in both W2 and W3 is fucking astounding.
My first thought is The Fortress of Doctor Radiaki for DOS.
A game I never played but is still memorable is early 2000s there was a game in Babbages in my local mall called "Prison Tycoon" that had a cop beating a black man on the box.
I was happy that the next release was pretty good.
Moo2 forever, though.
Superman 64.
Weeks and months of hype (the era of print gaming journalism), Blockbuster stocking 100 copies on launch day for "guaranteed availability" etc.
Then I finally popped the cart in, and this thing was so bad it just defied all logic. Horrific controls, shitty graphics, unclear user interface and objectives, terrible draw distance. Timed level segments and insane difficulty.
There might be "worse" games but I have never been more disappointed in a release than Superman 64.
myself and everyone I knew were massive fans of the N64 WCW and WWF games, but I had played the PS2 Yukes! games at friends houses and always kinda hated them. Ended up getting Wrestlemania X8 because I somehow got to actually go to the event at Skydome, and even with that huge bias still thought the game was shit and barely ever played it.
Wrestlemania was fucking wild though, it fell on the same day as St. Patricks and everyone there was drunk as shit, tons of fan scuffles and rowdiness, as a high schooler was a total blast.
C&C4, hands down. Single handedly murdered the whole franchise.
Edit: to be specific, I took this to mean “worst game by a major publisher”
I mean
Also, it worked markedly shittier on an unemulated speccy. This was the same year that saw the arcadey pinnacle of Jetpac and this glitchy creepy grindfest that challenges only patience and tolerance to noise gets itself a golden joystick for originality because of using lolrandom toy sprites.
Edit: I'm actually still mad 39 years later they made me fiddle with a screwdriver to load that shit
Auf YouTube findest du die angesagtesten Videos und Tracks. Außerdem kannst du eigene Inhalte hochladen und mit Freunden oder gleich der ganzen Welt teilen.www.youtube.com
Sea of Thieves.
That game is too buggy over the years it exists to be as popular as it is, and not in a "haha smol glitch" buggy, but "lets disconnect at the WORSE possible moments" (like you having a ton of loot).
Not worth it. A waste of 30 bucks.
Ni No Kuni 2. Looking for a new RPG, missing that anime aesthetic so I searched up "best JRPGs" (yes, yes I know now that it's supposed to be perjorative); kept seeing this recommended, including by randos on Reddit (so not just paid review sites).
After 45 minutes of the most cliche-filled cutscenes and a prolonged tutorial for basic gameplay, I finally can just try it out and... It's the most boring, generic gameplay ever. Dull story, bland characters, bland gameplay, too long of intro. 2/10
The only other game that comes close is Assassin's Creed 3. Finished the tutorial mission, made it to Boston, started chasing collectibles and trying to 100% the first map. Sunk in about 5 hours and can't find the rest of the collectibles, so I decide to move on and come back later.
That's when it hits you with "PSYCH! That was just the Prologue, and all that time and effort invested in this character is MEANINGLESS. Here's a brand new character to build up."
I hate that. I don't mind when the game begins with an OP character to show you the ropes only to take all of it away, but please make it short. I loved Metroid Prime, for example. Investing 5 hours to have all of it mean nothing to your character, and next to nothing for the story fucking sucks. 4/10, would probably still finish just because I loved 1+2.
Hydlide, probably. A deeply mediocre action RPG that came out on NES waaay after everyone else had one-upped it, or ten-upped it.
And I played it circa 1997.
No, hang on - I at least progressed in Hydlide. To this day I have no goddamn idea how to get out of the first room in Batman Forever. I had the Game Boy version. I did not buy this game. Some kid just gave it to me, which should have been a warning. As I understand it, all versions of the game are quite similar, which would be admirable if they were not, to a one, total dogshit. I think it's the Mortal Kombat engine used as a platformer... made by aliens.
Turok Evolution on GameCube.
It doesn’t look that bad on reviews, but it’s pretty awful.
So about 2 months ago I made this post about looking for an iPad replacement that runs Linux. I said I wasn't in a rush, but after thinking about it ever since and seeing the Minisforum V3 go on sale for just $1000, I pulled the trigger.
My impressions are still very new (I have used it for a total of 2 hours at this point), but I'm super happy so far. Installed Fedora 40 and almost everything works out of the box (including a Wacom MPP stylus). As mudkip mentioned in this blog, the volume buttons don't work when the keyboard is detached and auto-rotation doesn't work. The former isn't a big deal and the latter doesn't affect me in the slightest, but I can confirm those issues are still present on a stock Fedora install.
Anyway, there's not a lot of information about this tablet running Linux out there, is there anything anyone wants me to test or any questions I can answer?
Update: I have created an awesome-minisforum-v3 GitHub repository to list information for Minisforum V3 users, including some workarounds for the issues mentioned in this review. Quest for the IdealMudkip Mud Sport
Best "convertible" or 2-in-1 device to run Linux on?
The last device I own that doesn't run an open source operating system is an iPad. I basically use it as a laptop most of the time with a keyboard case, but I do like being able to take just the screen to use as a drawing/note-taking tablet. I treat it more like a "convertible" device rather than a tablet alone.I'm not in a rush to replace it, iPadOS is, eh, usable, but there are things that get on my nerves often. I definitely wouldn't be upgrading to another iPad model if this one died. I'm curious on what kind of hardware is available out there with good Linux support that I can keep in mind for the future. My only requirements would be that it runs normal Linux distros (ideally Fedora) and has a pen/display that supports pressure sensitivity.
The Minisforum V3 looks pretty damn cool. There's also the Microsoft Surface devices that ironically seem popular with Linux users. Anyone have any experience with these kinds of devices? What do you think? What's your favorite device in this class?
Really good, but I did have to remove the screen protector as I was getting line jitter with it on.
Palm rejection is better than I expected but not as good as an iPad.
I've been using a Wacom Bamboo Ink Plus. Pressure sensitivity and stuff works out of the box, no additional drivers needed or anything.
Krita is excellent.
I love horror but apparently I don't vibe with a lot of recommendations I find online.
I'd seen so much hype about Event Horizon and I absolutely hated it and didn't find it scary. I just watched Late Night With the Devil and whole it was definitely enjoyable, it wasn't the least but frightening. I also just watched Let the Right One In and really didn't like it. It also was not a horror movie in my opinion.
I will say one of my favorites is Sinister or the first Conjuring. Sinister for the stomach twisting dread and suspence throughout and Conjuring for the same.
So, what movies do you find to be the scariest?
There is a particular type of emotion which "The VVitch" and "Hereditary" get absolutely perfect. It's actually not really my favorite type of movie; it's not particular scary, per se, but it is just some stuff that is really awful that you don't want to see. If you don't want that, they may not be good, but if you vibe with that particular emotion they are hard to beat for it.
The HBO "Chernobyl" miniseries is absolutely straight-up horror. It has pretty much all the elements of a perfect horror movie, except it's (with tiny exceptions and artistic licenses) all 100% true.
"As Above, So Below" is fairly good "normal" horror of a fairly unspicy flavor.
That's honestly all I can think of that really does it well. Horror books in my experience are far better. "The Shining," "Pet Semetary," "Night Shift," and "Skeleton Crew." Also lots and lots of HP Lovecraft; the "Dunwich Horror" collection is wonderful.
Hope this helps.
Oooh yes. I'm with you and the other commenter that that particular feeling of dread is really really great. Hereditary, Midsommar, and VVitch definitely all fit that bill. I've heard the same for Lights Out, so I'm going to give that a go too.
Also Chernobyl is so so good. I've seen it a few times now and oof.
Oh I agree that they're not the only good horror movies, there are so many out there that are good in other ways and many of which I absolutely love. But I'm really just looking for that something to keep the lights on at night, lol.
Thanks for the list! There are a few I haven't seen in there, I'll give them a try 😀
As Above, So below is reasonably solid
There's a bit of a Mary Sue issue but otherwise good.
The original Candyman.
Everything about it is excellent and holds up even now. The musical score is exceptional.
Don't bother with the reboot. It has a message it's trying to send, which I get, but they've done it to the detriment of the horror. Something could've been done with the premise but they fell short.
OG all the way.
For me The Shining is one of the scariest movies and The VVITCH also comes really close to that feeling. For different types of horror I'd also recommend La Piel que Habito, Shutter and The Haunting of Hill House (the show).
And if you get the chance try the book version of Let the Right One In. It's much better than the movie and more of a horror imo.
Cloverfield - not sure if thats horror
Frailty
Insidious
As a kid i loved the early Jason and Freddy movies.
I'm noticing a distinct lack of Terrifier and Terrifier 2 in these comments. Art the Clown is perhaps the best antagonist I've ever seen in the horror genre and true originality is rare in the modern horror filmscape.
The Ring is also good for originality as far as modern classics, though it's a whole book series in Japan.
Edit: I also liked The Shrine, forgot to mention that one. Again, originality.
It Follows is definitely one of the best horror movies regarding suspense and general feeling of ... gloom?! Eireness?! Futility?! Darkness?! Whatever it is, I love it!
And the (potentially) underlying message is powerful.
And the (potentially) underlying message is powerful.
So this I didn't get. Dangers of STDs?
There is a single scene in this movie, involving a door, which makes my skin crawl harder than just about anything I've seen in film. It's also sadly spoiled slightly in one of the trailers, so I'd avoid those, but even if you do see it it's still impactful.
The rest of the movie is a solid 7-8/10 that does a great job of referencing a lot of classic horror.
Soft & quiet.
Humans are a terrible thing
Perfect Blue
I absolutely love and hate how they mess with your perception of not only time but what's real because I could see myself in situations where I couldn't tell you how long has passed and/or having to question if what I'm seeing is real or not.
Thanks for reminding me about this movie. Been meaning to watch this for a while.
edit: it was really good!
Blair Witch
::: spoilers
I'm glad I knew the ending was disappointing before going in.
:::
It hit on a very specific fear of mine that I have difficulty putting into words. The fear of developing a fear or maybe the fear of becoming superstitious?
I'm not scared easily, but Kothanodi had me watching through my fingers. It has four somewhat connected stories, and two of them are very fucked up. There's a decent amount of infanticide and other atrocities inflicted on minors, so be warned if you have any childhood trauma.
Also by the same director, the movie Aamis is about cannibalism acting as a replacement for sex. It's pretty fucked up as well.
I liked Noroi: The Curse.
No jumpscares, but really quite unsettling
Not a horror film per se, but definitely leaning that way:
The original 'ALIEN'.
The building of tension throughout the entire movie is brilliant.
I know it scared the shit out of me the first time I saw it.
I was 15 and my family rented it. So I didn't get to see it in its full theater screen glory. Just a 25" console TV from a well worn VHS cassette where the top 25% of the screen was wavy.
And yes, I'm old.
I think Alien is a great movie (and definitely horror), but whether it scares modern audiences is pretty hit and miss. It's very slow paced and while I love the practical effects, the alien looks downright goofy in some scenes. I certainly don't find it scary having seen it, and new viewers I've shown it to usually aren't that scared unless they're self-identified wimps when it comes to horror. Aliens is scarier I think, even though it's more action than pure horror.
Same goes 10x for The Exorcist. It tops a lot of "scariest movie ever" lists online, but watching it today is more comical than anything. I think you have to be scared of demonic possession actually happening IRL to get scared by that movie.
It’s an interesting movie. In a lot of ways it’s annoying or underwhelming and not much actually happens, but I actually loved the ending.
::: spoiler Tap for spoiler
The way the entire film, from the lore that was set up in the early interviews, was all brought together instantly in a single iconic five-second shot blew me away. It stuck with me for a long time.
:::
Some suggestions from my side - in addition to many already posted suggestions I would add to my list as well:
It has a lot of black magic and jinns in it, which are quite consistent with islamic mythology. The horror hits you differently if you have heard stories about it in your childhood.
I mean for me, i can shrug off almost anything with "yeah right" but when it comes to islamic mythology, i kinda believe in it so it's more scary.
I've never seen this version? But I have read the book and eugh. It's horrible in a sort of losing bodily autonomy way.
This one sat with me for a long time and I swore immediately after watching it that I would never watch it again. And now I absolutely love it. There are a few bright moments that really freak me out, but the tension and build up is so good. Chef's kiss to this one.
Haven't seen!
One of my favorites! I know this one gets dragged for being campy(??), but I think the original did an excellent job of building suspense and dread.
Mike Flanagan is one of my favorites and this one is a lot of fun. Not as high in my list as others, but still a good time.
I need to rewatch the miniseries, but I wasn't a huge fan of the more recent movies. I think the actors were all great (especially for Pennywise), but it felt like it was trying too hard? Pt 2 seemed to realize they'd never match the book and it ended up being more funny than anything.
These are all being added to my list!
Bleh. Lol
Love these movies. I would add the first half of Insidious as well.
As for my list - I'll throw that in a separate comment soon enough 😁
I am too lazy to change the formatting, but those are my notes on the movies I've seen this summer.. some of them I remember better than others, and I've definitely forgotten to include quite a few on here.
[V] Late night with the devil - 7/10 Fun, unique
[V] Barbarian 5/10 - Ew, asshole characters
[V] Talk to me 7/10 - unique, uncomfortable
[V] Hell House LLC 7/10 - fun, scary
[V] Smile 7/10 - didn't need the ending, excited for the sequel
[V] The menu 9/10 - dread, uncomfortable
[V] Anna and the apocalypse 7/10 - fun! Sad!
[V] The descent 6/10 - strong people, ew
[V] Event horizon 0/10 - ew, ew
[V] Train to busan 10/10 - terrifying, great characters
[V] Underwater 7.5/10 - claustrophobic, unique
[V] The cleansing hour 7/10 - unique, funny
[V] Sputnik 5/10 - ((can't remember))
[V] Freaky 6.5/10 - funny
[V] Longlegs - undecided. But maybe 8/10? Dreadful
If you want something a bit different, seek out Threads. It's on the Internet Archive (here, in fact)
Not a traditional horror film at all, it's set in the north of England in the early 80s (depending what n where you're from, the accents might prove a challenge!) and shows the ordinary people of a small city gradually coming to terms with escalating tensions between East and West, which result in all out nuclear war.
And then we get to see the actual on the ground nightmare that that would be. Not in a showy Hollywood way but in a grim, horrifyingly real feeling gritty British drama way. Bleak isn't the word.
It's something that's never quite left me since I saw it for the first and so far only time some years ago. Truly disturbing, and not fun at any point after things start getting serious. Brilliant though.
Important movie about nukesInternet Archive
so many recommendations already said and im sure many more to go.
Three that i didnt see mentioned that i enjoyed were:
Martyrs- French Version
The Visit
Session 9
Scenes from martyrs have been memed out of context so i think its fairly familiar. i hadnt watched it until recently and i think one time through was good enough for me. i’m not into a lot of torture style suspense.
The visit was particularly scary for me because If you’ve ever been in that scenario of being dropped off with familial strangers those initial reservations you have running through your head do make you uncomfortable and blossom into horrific thoughts. in the case of this movie a bit more so ;)
Session 9 i watched during the golden age of netflix. it isnt amazing but it was enjoyable.
Wow you have some fun ahead of you. And from what you’ve said, despite a few (strong) disagreements, I think you have great taste.
The Exorcist Version You’ve Never Seen just adds some deleted scenes back into the mix. A common complaint is that it escalates too quickly as a result, but damn if it didn’t stick with me.
Blair Witch is a real divisive one but if it hits, it hits RIGHT.
Paranormal Activity is in my pantheon of game changers. It’s not perfect (Micah can fuck off forever please) but the way it established the day/night safe/scary cycle only to violate it at the end was a master stroke.
Ouija is just the best creepy Flanagan film for me, but I think my favorite of his is actually Oculus. I love that it’s legitimately trying to avoid the pitfall of dying from dumb decisions by starting off with “let’s study the shit out of this evil”. I also adore Doctor Sleep and Haunting of Hill House.
The It miniseries scared the hell out of me as a child so I can’t promise it’ll be as good now. I thought Chapter 1 was really solid and creepy but the second one dropped the ball really hard.
I saw it when I was in my early twenties and I’d never seen it before. But tons of pop culture had made jokes of everything in the movie and I expected it to just be a laugh.
The film did such a good job developing dread and helplessness that I forgot all about the jokes.
::: spoiler Tap for spoiler
Plus the spider walk scene hits you in the face like a hatchet.
:::
Megan is Missing (2011) is one of the most horrifying films I've ever seen. Fair warning though, the last ten minutes are excruciatingly painful to watch. It is not for the faint of heart.
In the gore porn genre Cannibal Holocaust (1980) and Hostel (2005) are vile, but so pointlessly gorey the actual horror (the brutality of men) is almost entirely lost.
Funny Games (1997), or the 2007 American remake for those who don't love subtitles, is another unnerving portrayal of ultra violence. It's not gore porn, but is graphic. The original version's pacing will make you squirm in your seat.
Hush (2016) and Creep (2014) are two of my movie-night-with-friends films. Still very much about the human monster, but not overly graphic and prefers to build by making the viewer a partial participant. You have to be a certain level of broken to enjoy some of the others on my list, but these two are disney movies compared to Cannibal Holocaust.
::: spoiler Major spoiler!
She's suffering an eating disorder. Notice how all the horror she encounters involves food and things being shoved down her throat or vomit? Notice her hair falling out, random nose bleeds and hallucinations? Far more than that! Watch it with an eye towards anorexia or bulimia.
:::
I tried a few different things, and eventually settled on my own budgeting spreadsheet that I did in Apple numbers. I have tabs for each pay period, and I am working on having amounts automatically roll over to the next tab.
EDIT: I tried YNAB and was tearing out my non-existent hair. What a non-intuitive cluster fuck of twisted logic.
The Bogleheads Guide to Investing was the thing that helped me the most. My family got me prepared for day to day finance, but nobody explained retirement savings to me.
This book broke everything down into easy to understand terms, and made me feel comfortable investing wisely.
The book used to be free online, but I don't see it anymore. You could search up a PDF, or they have a really good wiki that covers most of it, but more briefly. Here is the Getting Started page.
Bogleheads' Guide to InvestingInternet Archive
Perfect!
Give that a read, and then if you want to follow it, the wiki will give you the current lowest costs funds for all the major companies so you can do your IRA/401/HSA into the best funds available.
Bogleheads, and the bogleheads guide to investing
https://www.bogleheads.org/wiki/Bogleheads%C2%AE_personal_finance_planning_start-up_kit
https://www.bogleheads.org/wiki/Bogleheads%27_Guide_To_Investing
I'm very glad that someone recommended me bogleheads, after reading, I was able to open up a roth and contribute yearly which may be one of the best personal finance decisions I've made.
Honestly, everyone else has it spot on with the retirement advice. Even people that are north of $10M net worth follow that same advice.
For personal day-to-day stuff I would recommend You Need A Budget.
This is a fantastic way to keep a budget.
Working hard with nothing to show for it? Use your money more efficiently and control your spending and saving with the YNAB app.www.ynab.com
The book "I will teach you to be rich" has a great overview of how to best leverage credit cards, high yield savings accounts, setting up automatic investments, saving, and lots of other 'good to know' topics about money.
For investing specifically I use the Boglehead method.
Watch videos from these three and you will learn a lot:
Ben Felix
Plain Bagle
Two Cents
Avoid any youtubers that give advice on specific stocks to buy. All mentioned above are professionals, with different specialities within finance and personal finance.
Also be very skeptical about cryptocurrencies. If you want to invest in it, then it should be a very low allocation. Maybe 1-2% of your net wealth. Most cryptocurrencies and projects are a scam. The youtubers I suggested do not promote crypto, or specific stocks.
I am not a professional, so keep that in mind 😀
Starting to manage your personal finances using a dedicated software application will help you adopt healthy financial habits.
I'd recommend this free and open-source personal finance application: MoneyManager Ex - https://moneymanagerex.org/
It works on Windows, MacOS, Linux, and Android.
Disclaimer: I'm not affiliated in any way. I've just been happy with the application for more than 7 years.
Open-source, cross-platform, software that helps you organize your finances and keep track of where, when and to who the money goes. It is also a great tool to get a bird's eye view of your financial worth.MoneyManager Ex
https://lemm.ee/c/casualconversation
Maybe this one? You may need to check with the mods if it's allowed though.
Well fuck me then I guess.
It's still more active than the others.
Edit: also, you said "popular" in the title, not "active". The one that someone tried reviving 4 months ago still meets the criteria compared to 4 others with no posts at all in over a year
I searching for a tablet for drawing and discovered this one. Anyone tried drawing on it? I wondering if the experience is good.
On the page they doesn't mention if the screen supports drawing pens, but it's possible to order an MPP pen with it, so I assume that it works with Wacom or Surface pens?
Its fanless design ensures your StarLite will never make more than a whisper - unless you want it to. The Mk V supports coreboot open source firmware which you can effortlessly configure to your preferences via our coreboot configurator.Star Labs®
This seems interesting, never seen it before.
But i'd say be careful as there's not much information on the screen (refresh rate, gamut range) and it's great to brag about you being able to switch parts but there's not much info on that, i'd be surprised if you can swap anything beside the ssd and some ram. Also the marketing is a bit weird, the keyboard is showed at all time but the price shown is wothout until you try to actually check the price... Kinda scummy if you ask me.
A part of me still think it looks a bit like a barebone low quality tech that is almost useless in it's option-less, low spec state.
That's interesting details, thanks!
I saw a few posts on their reddit, like this, they were positive, but no one mentioned the drawing aspect...
Uh, the refresh rate is 60hz the gamut is listed on the specification section. The ram is soldered as it could not be increased it is 16gb which is the max supported by the n200.
main board, screen, battery, daughter board and all the parts can be swapped, they sell them on their website.
I agree the keyboard marketing sucks and the keyboard itself isn't great either. Granted its nice to have a cheaper option without the keyboard, but in current Linux tablet state you probably still want it.
The specs are pretty decent for a tablet and the price of the device. Can handle most tablet tasks and non graphically intensive. I use it for programming and arts and anything needing more power I offload the compile to my PC.
the pen I bought supports tilt. The one starlabs sells does not.
MPP is the protocol and has different versions like ho Bluetooth or WiFi do. MPP 2.0 has existed for a while it isn't new.
Thank you for taking the time to clarify all that.
Tilt is really critical for a good drawing and especially painting experience.
but capacitive (most new touch screens) don’t seem to detect the Wacom pen
Yes, it's totally expected! But looks like this screen supports MPP pens.
I was kind of turned off by the keeb* being sold separately, also wasnt the aspect ratio meh.
Rule of thumb larger screen or surface means more fluid strokes, thus smaller screen means more fine motor skills and more tension in the hand and led fluidity in the work.
I was incorrect about the aspect ratio it's 3:2 not 16:9 and I think 3:2 is fine especially at 2160x1440p.
Still with the dialogs on the left and right anything except minimal would make the drawing area small taking the left and right.
I did notice it on sale, maybe if you have humble expectations it would be okay for sketching, but if you are used to better quality things or larger draw surfaces you might not be easily impressed.
Hey, I own one of these. For drawing its pretty solid and most software can run on it. The device support MPP 1.51 and 2.0, they sell a 1.51 pen but its quite expensive for what it is. The digitizer isn't amazing and I have found external wacom screens to be better but considering the price of the starlite is about the same (when I bought it) as an only drawing tab I went with the starlite.
Performance is decent, I was quite surprised how managable the n200 is. Personally I use it as a study device and it handles 40 Firefox tabs and 15-20 windows just fine. Only thing is that gnome does not support triple buffering yet so overview animation is slightly laggy on the 3k screen, however this is less on the 2k version and fixed with the triple buffer PR.
The screen itself comes in either 3k or 2k. The 3k screen was only the first batch and the second+ batch is 2k. Screen is 60hz and I believe 300 nits.
To get buttons mappable on the pen device currently you have to use a custom libwacom entry. I have a PR for that on the github.
The Tablet itself is very solid the main complaint I would have is the keyboard, its quite mushy and bounces as it doesn't have much structure. Its alright but not amazing.
Realistic battery is 4-6hr under usage and 9-13 with light usage and ~2 days in full sleep.
main board, screen, battery, daughter board and all the parts can be swapped, they sell them on their website.
This is very helpful, thank you a lot!
How is the passive cooling? Does it get hot?
I am trying to create a KVM/QEMU/Virt-Manager VM without exposing my IP/internet connection to it. I pay for a VPN subscription, and I typically access it through wireguard configs that integrate with my distro (Fedora 40 Workstation) and DE VPN menus. From my understanding, as I have them set up now, I can enable one of these configurations in my settings, and all of my traffic is routed through the VPN, except for my local network.
I want this VM guest to have all of its traffic sent to the VPN as well, with the exception of some connection between it and the host, so I could still access it from the host for utilities like ssh.
Is it possible to achieve this? When I looked online, it seemed to require some CLI configuration of IP routes, and I didn't feel confident not understanding the changes I was making, as I want to make sure it is impossible to leak; it just shouldn't have any access to my normal network. If my VPN is disabled on the host, then it simply shouldn't be able to access the internet.
This is possible, and exact directions will vary on distribution of the vm client. I personally do this but with split horizon dns and dnsmasq on a vm.
impossible to leak is where it gets tricky, and that will require an understanding of networking in your distribution. there will also be tutorials on this, but it's very easy to mess up.
There are so many options it is almost impossible to know where to start!
Which distro is the VM running (is it even Linux)?
If you want the VM to use the host's VPN then you will need some routing and perhaps NAT/masquerade. This is non trivial to sort out. Can the VM have its own VPN connection to your supplier?
You are starting to reach the point where VLANs/subnets and separate routers (real or VM) may be required. Depending what you use as your ISP router, we might be able to get a solution together - so what model is it and do you have any switches?
This can be handled pretty much entirely on the host by configuring your qemu settings; it's got very robust virtual networking options. Basically just expose the host's VPN interface (e.g. usually called something like tun) for VPN access, and make a separate virtual interface that only the host and guest can access for the stuff like ssh.
Here's the qemu wiki about networking, definitely where you should start
In 4 things white people can do to start making the fediverse less toxic for Black people (DRAFT!) and its cross-posts, quite a few people said things like "maybe racism is a problem on Mastodon, but I don't see it on Lemmy." Of course, plenty of comments in the various threads were in fact examples of racism on Lemmy, so one takeaway is that at lot of people don't see racism even when they're looking at it. And helpful commenters pointed out some of the other patterns of racism on Lemmy. ... but that wasn't really the thrust of that discussion.
So I wanted to ask more generally, what are some of the examples you've seen of racism on Lemmy? Quotes and links are great, but also feel free just to describe examples or call out more general patterns!
I follow your blog from time to time and I appreciate it. Just with your recent posts I realized you have an active Lemmy account.
I was going to continue this comment with "But I don't get...", then I stopped and read your blog post again and remembered rule #2. I think I get what you are trying to say, it's good that there are some mod tools to help with modding, but they're not enough, and even if racism isn't as visible on Lemmy, people targeted by racism still exist and get hurt. So I guess your point is be more proactive than reactive. People don't get that, and even if they are well intentioned, they think of all the defederating and banning examples as "good enough". Early adopters are also overprotective with Lemmy and its small community, especially when a newcomer directly questions "how is racism in this community?" They found their peaceful corner of the internet (relative to major social media platforms), they know it has its flaws, but since the beginning they had to defend to questions like "who owns the data?", "what happens with deleted posts / comments", "is defederatation effective", "can mods and admins become too powerful", "how long till this gets the same fate as Reddit", etc. I'm not defending the behaviour, just thinking of an explanation. Because frankly, I'm also surprised by the downvotes and backlash you received.
And so, my comment changed to "Hi Jon! Keep up the good work!"
My old man has a bunch of .dox stuff saved. He has complicated large files saved that are not supported by any of the FOSS conversion tools. I've tried Libre office, Abi Word, and every command line tool and converter I can find. These are entire book sized files.
I have a W10 machine with Word. Is extracting the .exe and running it with wine feasible without making an epic mess or massive project of this?
You can try Pandoc and see if that works, Google Docs, Office365, finding an abandonware version of Word and running on Wine...lots of options to work with.
It might be easier to start narrowing down where you need to look if you get the header info from one of these files.
I was thinking along the same lines. Use the online version available via portal.office.com, and use that to convert everything to something more FOSS-friendly.
Not sure if access is free, though.
Dont buy Office 365, just use the Office live.com. Yes, Microsoft are reusing their live.com.
It is free, I use it for dealing with résumés.
I wouldn't even try with wine these days.
Why don't you use the Win10 machine you have, the online version of Microsoft Office (web browser or app), a VM with Windows, or (if it works for your case) Google Docs or OnlyOffice.
It's recent stuff. He likes a Fedora machine, but the only issue is the inability to replicate his Word docs. At this point I don't know if Libre tools will be easy enough for him. There us nothing really intelligent happening in these files. He is not capable of handling any kind of real world complexity. So everything is going to be whatever was made super simple and easy in m$ Word.
I went through my old CD collection, but don't have disks beyond Office for XP.
Assuming the latest version of OpenOffice doesn't work for these files...
My next course of action would be using the Win 10 machine with Word, or a VM with Win10 or 11 and the latest version of Word. Use MASGrave to trick M$ into considering it licensed if you need to.
Use a Powershell script to interact with Word through the COM object interface and automate opening Word, opening the file, saving it as a different filetype, and closing. Here's a snippet of Powershell from Reddit for going in the opposite direction (odt to docx) for a single file. I wouldn't try to do this through Linux, just suck it up and use Windows so you don't have an extra layer of mess to deal with.
Going off M$ documentation of the save types enum, I would replace "wdFormatDocumentDefault" in that snippet with wdFormatOpenDocumentText or wdFormatStrictOpenXMLDocument, then test it with a single file to see which gives the output you need.
Getting all the files of the starting type from a folder can be done using Get-ChildItem. Store those in a variable and use a foreach loop over the initial file list.
Specifies the format to use when saving a document.learn.microsoft.com
Not to be confused with OpenOffice.
(LibreOffice forked from OO back then.)
Long past, but for old files especially, old .doc files it is great as a backup.
It lives in a VM that never has access to the internet, it almost never gets started up.
It's not open source but probably has the best compatibility. You can give it a shot.
https://www.freeoffice.com/en/
Needs an account after one week though.
FreeOffice, the best free alternative to Microsoft Office (Word, Excel, PowerPoint) for Windows, Mac and Linuxwww.freeoffice.com
I bought a cheap win11+office 2021 combo on the net and use a VM. Its not the easiest way but it works...
😔
Assuming you meant ".docx files", those should open without issue in LibreOffice. As other have said, OnlyOffice is another popular option if format preservation is a goal.
What do you mean when you say the files are "not supported" by the tools you've tried? What, exactly, is happening and what are you trying to accomplish? The end goal wasn't clear to me from your post.
Yes .docx.
It appears as though the encoding is missing in such a way that nothing in Linux recognizes the file. The underlying CLI tools don't have a way of converting the file. I tried with Python's docx tool and with iconv. It has to be encoding related because some tools initially load the file with several sets of Asian characters instead of English. However, there is no hexadecimal or sections of entirely binary looking data. Archiving tools do not open up the the file to reveal anything else like a metafile or header. Neo vim shows garbled nonsense throughout. Bat warns of binary. Python won't load the file, nor will Only Office. Libre Office and Abi Word load initially with Asian characters before crashing.
The only option is likely gong to be setting up the W10 machine and converting a bunch of files within it.
Ultimately, my old man thinks he can be an author all of the sudden and is trying to write. He's not very capable of learning. I'm not confident that he can learn to use FOSS to do the same thing he has been doing. This post was just to see if there are options I am not already aware of that might actually work in practice. I can easily do everything I need in FOSS. I can do everything he needs to do. I'm more concerned about becoming his tech support when he forgets how to copy pasta. He already fails to separate the internet hardware connectivity from the web browser and operating system within his mental model of technology.
Thanks for clarifying, and I can appreciate your overall concerns as I face the same dilemma with my aging relatives.
Just to confirm, have you opened these files in Word yourself (or witnessed them being opened), to verify they are in fact valid documents?
It wouldn't be the first time I've seen "other" files renamed with an incorrect file extension.
Sounds like it's actually a .doc file that has been renamed to a .docx for some reason. Real MS Word would probably still open it fine, but open source tools would fall over hard.
You mentioned you can't decompress it either. If it was a real .docx you could rename the extension to .zip and unzip it with any archiver to see the contents. If the archiver complains about the format, then it's not a real docx.
If it really is a .doc file and written in an ASCII-compatible encoding as most English-language documents are, opening it in a hex editor (or a non-codepage-aware text editor like the Notepad on a W10 or earlier Windows machine) will show an indecipherable proprietary header followed by the text in the file, possibly with a single space or "junk" character between each letter depending on the exact version of Word and system encoding it was written with. There may be occasional additional stretches of markup junk. At the end, there will be a footer with occasional decipherable text strings like "MSWordDoc" and font names.
If you open a .docx file in such a program, you should get a typical zipfile signature: the letters "PK" at the beginning of the file, followed by a lot of gobbledegook. If you don't get that "PK", it probably isn't a .docx.
(I've looked at a lot of MS file guts, for both curiosity and information extraction purposes.)
I will agree with the people suggesting "VM and a pirated copy"
Just get like office 2010 and windows 7 off of the web, run it in a VM, convert the files, dump it all.
Instead of pirating anything, you can instead use:
https://github.com/massgravel/Microsoft-Activation-Scripts for activation
https://massgrave.dev/office_msi_links for download of office
A Windows and Office activator using HWID / Ohook / KMS38 / Online KMS activation methods, with a focus on open-source code and fewer antivirus detections. - massgravel/Microsoft-Activation-ScriptsGitHub
I wouldn't know, but since OP is having compatibility issues, I'd try to get as close to native as I could. Eliminate the room-for-error. Hence the VM with actual Windows.
They can just delete the lot after they've converted their files to an opener format. 😛
To be honest, there’s a few good comments linking to scripts and methods here to batch convert them on a windows pc/vm. That’s the best way to go.
To add on to their comments. If you’re just interested in preserving them then maybe printing them to pdf, specifically pdf/a, would be my approach once you got them opened.
I'm pretty sure Apple and Google already rewritten all important GNU parts into something with Apache or BSD license, to throw everything GPL licensed out of their embedded systems. The biggest and most important part was obviously GCC, replaced by Clang.
How many GPL-licensed system libraries and tools are in Android right now, except for the kernel? I'm pretty sure the answer is zero.
Yeah, gotta’ love how all the Apple fanboys were like Bash? Meh’ zsh is the superior shell in the span of a day.
I mean was the GPL viral… yeah probably. But it’s not like the courts came after either of them. Or ever really will in a meaningful way. Although hope springs eternal for non-webkit browsers in the not-EU 😌
Clang and the LLVM with BSD like licences so we can get the 80's suing experience of UNIX yet again.
It's impressive how many people in the FOSS community hate GNU. Even to the point of creating OSes without GNU in it. Working for free for companies just to get their contributions stolen or expunged.
Apple loves Open Source, they can stole it as they like, like they did with Darwin (a derivation of XNU). Everything is open until we no longer want to, and you don't have any right to desist such actions. This sounds like a dream for them.
Google loves Open Source, they can build an spyware, ad vending machine, DRM platform that is hosted in almost any IOT machine. This is Android.
The community has to realize that if you care about your software you have to ENFORCE the freedom of it.
The are entire projects just to liberate android from google. That's is all fault of the open source licence.
There are quite a lot of projects which exist to liberate software projects that have been taken hostage. This is no sense.
Most of the IOT devices are presenting paywall features thanks to Android: cars, fridges, TVs, etc. What is next?
XNU is the kernel in Darwin, XNU is an Apple product derived from BSD and Mach. Darwin has a lot of FreeBSD in it.
Apple shares that code though. It’s on GitHub. There used to be Darwin distributions.
Your Android example doesn’t make very much sense either. The largest Android issues are typically hardware lockdown. Nothing about the GPL prevents someone building an ad platform that spies on you, it just makes them share the source code for it. Google’s licensing choices means they don’t share the source code for the Google pieces they put on top of AOSP, the entire project means people can build the alternatives though.
The lawsuits were about AT&Ts proprietary license. BSD and similar licenses are not that.
BSD licence allowed to work with the AT&T licence which at the end generated all the drama. Unix wars.
Again BSD is great if you don't care about what will happen with your code.
Yeah the Android point doesn't have any sense, that's right.
Apple shares the code of the parts they want. Since it's not a copyleft licence, then they can still ship you a version of Darwin + privative code as your macOs without sharing the entire code. So you end running kind of Frankenstein program with parts you don't know what they do.
AOSP is not a great licence because it allows Google benefit from contributions, but then it has tons of privative software on top. So basically contributing to the AOSP means that you improve the code that later it's used in combination with privative one.
My point is that libre source code should enforce that derivations of it stay libre. Otherwise you are working for free for companies that don't care about the users.
Hey for companies is a good point. The best system for them is open source. It makes sense for them to use it. And open source is much better than just privative.
From the point of view of the individual user and developer is not that great. It kind of hooks you in because it has open source parts, but you are probably unaware of all the closed source stuff that runs in combination with it.
I get the open source point, but I don't find it fair at the long term for the individual developer and user.
Over the years I've become convinced that the BSD license is great for code you don't care about. I'll use it myself. If there’s a library routine that I just want to say 'hey, this is useful to anybody and I’m not going to maintain this,' I’ll put it under the BSD license.Linus Torvals at LinuxCon 2016
Yeah. And I like how even from the message it shows that it's been already well recognized by then.
If I recall correctly from some RMS' talks I've seen many years ago, they've been working on it for years before, it's just the kernel that was missing. As I see it, GNU and Linux was the breakthrough for FLOSS, since at that time you would still have to use a proprietary kernel. (Well, there's GNU Hurd, but I'm not sure if it existed at that time, and even if it did, it was not ready.)
I love it, totally should have gone with that.
“This is Linus Torvalds introducing minix as Linux.”
(just a hobby, won't be big and professional like gnu)
Aged like fine milk. Looking at you, GNU Hurd.
GNU Hurd didn't take a good path of development following MACH design. But I still think GNU Hurd is the kernel of the future. Probably the Next generation Hurd. Just because GNU MACH and Hurd present very convoluted designs.
A kernel that performs most of their activities in user space and that it is truly modular looks very promising for the kind of systems we have nowadays and in the future.
Someone has to make the change, or we will stagnate in cumbersome and up featured systems.
https://www.linuxjournal.com/article/10754
MINIX originally was developed in 1987 by Andrew S. Tanenbaum as a teaching tool for his textbook Operating Systems Design and Implementation. Today, it is a text-oriented operating system with a kernel of less than 6,000 lines of code. MINIX's largest claim to fame is as an example of a microkernel, in which each device driver runs as an isolated user-mode process—a structure that not only increases security but also reliability, because it means a bug in a driver cannot bring down the entire system.In its heyday during the early 1990s, MINIX was popular among hobbyists and developers because of its inexpensive proprietary license. However, by the time it was licensed under a BSD-style license in 2000, MINIX had been overshadowed by other free-licensed operating systems.
Today, MINIX is best known as a footnote in GNU/Linux history. It inspired Linus Torvalds to develop Linux, and some of his early work was written on MINIX. Probably too, Torvalds' early decision to support the MINIX filesystem is responsible for the Linux kernel's support of almost every filesystem imaginable.
Later, Torvalds and Tanenbaum had a frank e-mail debate about the relative merits of macrokernels (sic) and microkernels. This early history resurfaced in 2004 when Kenneth Brown of the Alexis de Tocqueville Institution prepared a book alleging that Torvalds borrowed code from MINIX—a charge that Tanenbaum, among others, so comprehensively debunked, and the book was never actually published (see Resources).
See also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanenbaum%E2%80%93Torvalds_debate
Today, MINIX is best known as a footnote in GNU/Linux history.
It's still used tho.
What was minix then? A non FOSS version?
It wasn't FOSS, but then neither was Linux originally.
That kind of depends on how you define FOSS. The way we think of that today was in very early stages back in the 1991 and the orignal source was distributed as free, both as in speech and as in beer, but commercial use was prohibited, so it doesn't strictly speaking qualify as FOSS (like we understand it today). About a year later Linux was released under GPL and the rest is history.
Public domain code, academic world with any source code and things like that predate both Linux and GNU by a few decades and even the Free Software Foundation came 5-6 years before Linux, but the Linux itself has been pretty much as free as it is today from the start. GPL, GNU, FSF and all the things Stallman created or was a part of (regardless of his conflicting personality) just created a set of rules on how to play this game, pretty much before any game or rules for it existed.
Minix was a commercial thing from the start, Linux wasn't, and things just refined on the way. You are of course correct that the first release of Linux wasn't strictly speaking FOSS, but the whole 'FOSS' mentality and rules for it wasn't really a thing either back then.
There's of course adacemic debate to have for days on which came first and what rules whoever did obey and what release counts as FOSS or not, but for all intents and purposes, Linux was free software from the start and the competition was not.
Agree with you up until “the competition was not”.
GNU HURD was competition for one thing.
More importantly, so was BSD. BSD predates Linux ( though its distribution specifically as FreeBSD does not ).
I've read Linus's book several years ago, and based on that flimsy knowledge on back of my head, I don't think Linus was really competing with anyone at the time. Hurd was around, but it's still coming soon(tm) to widespread use and things with AT&T and BSD were "a bit" complex at the time.
BSD obviously has brought a ton of stuff on the table which Linux greatly benefited from and their stance on FOSS shouldn't go without appreciation, but assuming my history knowledge isn't too badly flawed, BSD and Linux weren't straight competitors, but they started to gain traction (regardless of a lot longer history with BSD) around the same time and they grew stronger together instead of competing with eachother.
A ton of us owes our current corporate lifes to the people who built the stepping stones before us, and Linus is no different. Obviously I personally owe Linus a ton for enabling my current status at the office, but the whole thing wouldn't been possible without people coming before him. RMS and GNU movement plays a big part of that, but equally big part is played by a ton of other people.
I'm not an expert by any stretch on history of Linux/Unix, but I'm glad that the people preceding my career did what they did. Covering all the bases on the topic would require a ton more than I can spit out on a platform like this, I'm just happy that we have the FOSS movement at all instead of everything being a walled garden today.
386BSD was not available until some months after Linux was released, so you had GNU with no working kernel and BSD not yet available on the hardware he had, hardware a lot of normal people had. I think the GPL also felt more philosophically right to many of them, and it limited how much they needed to re-do work that someone else had already done but kept secret.
The AT&T lawsuit definitely hampered BSD growth just as it was ported to the 386, but it was filed after Linux was already a thing.
A microkernel teaching OS by Andrew S. Tanenbaum.
In 2017 the world (including Tanenbaum) found out that the Intel Management Engine uses Minix internally. Intel just kind of did that silently. So Minix is still around.
Funny how he made it basically for his desktop computer.
33 years later, and Linux is dominating in every part of the OS world except ... the desktop.
(I'm paraphrasing his quote -- he said something like this years ago, can't find it, though.)
You might be thinking of this:
https://youtu.be/ZPUk1yNVeEI?feature=shared
Where he mentioned that the desktop is unique in that it has to support thousands of different devices for all kinds of people, and that most people don't really care what their computer is running as long as it works.
Well, I was thinking of a quote that was much more similar to what I wrote (and it's not in the video you linked).
I had such a trouble finding it that I'm starting to feel like it might be one of those "quotes" where the credited author never really said that, but I haven't completely given up 😁
Here's one closer to what I paraphrased (but not quite it)--quoting an article from cio.com
While Linux pretty much dominates almost every walk of our lives, even on the consumer devices like smartphones and smart TVs, it has not had the same success on the desktop. What does Torvalds think about it? Is Linux a failure on the desktop? Not really. “The desktop hasn’t really taken over the world like Linux has in many other areas, but just looking at my own use, my desktop looks so much better than I ever could have imagined. Despite the fact that I’m known for sometimes not being very polite to some of the desktop UI people, because I want to get my work done. Pretty is not my primary thing. I actually am very happy with the Linux desktop, and I started the project for my own needs, and my needs are very much fulfilled. That’s why, to me, it’s not a failure. I would obviously love for Linux to take over that world too, but it turns out it’s a really hard area to enter. I’m still working on it. It’s been 25 years. I can do this for another 25. I’ll wear them down.”
...and other interesting tidbits from the Embedded Linux Conference.rnSwapnil Bhartiya (CIO)
I would argue that it does dominate the desktop now as well, just not by usage numbers.
If I was told I had to use a windows desktop these days at home I think I'd start investing in a very large book collection.
You have to use a Windows desktop at home.
Sincerely,
Barnes & Noble
It's not about the distro. Most distros out right now are pretty good. What you need is hardware that lots of people want to buy with Linux installed on it as the default choice. Normal people don't want to install any OS, be it Linux, Windows, MacOS or BSD. Whatever comes by default, it's good.
I'm pretty sure that right now the most popular Linux distros are ChromeOS and SteamOS. I wonder why
I had a science teacher that told us, "If you sneeze three times and nobody blesses you, the devil takes your soul!"
It's science.
You have command of English grammar, clearly.
How's your Finnish?
...probably never will support anything other than AT-harddisks. That's all I have. 🙁.
Cuteness.
Yeah, I was looking at it today actually.
Happy Birthday, Linux.
This one from LTT?
Auf YouTube findest du die angesagtesten Videos und Tracks. Außerdem kannst du eigene Inhalte hochladen und mit Freunden oder gleich der ganzen Welt teilen.www.youtube.com
People back then just grossly underestimated how big computing was going to be.
The human brain is not built to predict exponential growths!
The amount of effort I do to try and avoid using double parentesis is trully herculean.
I think that stuff is the product of a completionist/perfectionist mindset - as one is writting, important details/context related to the main train of thought pop-up in one's mind and as one is writting those, important details/context related to the other details/context pop-up in one's mind (and the tendency is to keep going down the rabbit hole).
You get this very noticeably with people who during a conversation go out on a tangent and often even end up losing the train of thought of the main conversation (a tendecy I definitelly have) since one doesn't get a chance to go back and re-read, reorganise and correct during a spoken conversation.
Personally I don't think it's an actual quality (sorry to all upvoters) as it indicates a disorganised mind. It is however the kind of thing one overcomes with experience and I bet Mr Torvalds himself is mostly beyond it by now.
at that point I start recycling them, and go back to parenthesis.
so when bp = 300x - 3, this:
4( 4[ 4{ 15bp + 10 } - 375 ] - 2250 ) - 15000
would turn to
4( 4[ 4{ 15( 300x - 3) + 10 } - 375 ] - 2250 ) - 15000
perhaps not the best, but I rather stick to conventional symbols rather than using... idk, question marks? that'd be funny as hell, though
just picture it:
4© 4« 4¿ 15bp + 10 ? - 375 » - 2250 🄯 - 15000
perfectionist mindset - as one is writing,
I think an "M-Dash (perfectionist mindest/ — as one is writing,)" would be more appropriate than an "N-Dash" in your statement. No 'nested' parentheses needed (unless you're looking to add non-essential info (though insightful) to your sentence), but the type of... "PAUSE" makes all the difference
^[text here]]
Just a few moments ago I was a SurfingKeys user, an extension for browser to get Vim inspired key bindings and functionality (and more) in the browser. It also has a feature to edit text areas (like this body text here) in a dedicated popup window to emulate a few Vim like features. It's nice to have, but I always wanted to edit in my real Vim configuration. I learned another extension Tridactyl does exactly that!
But to get that external editor functionality working, its a little bit more involved. Besides installing the main extension for Firefox, there is a helper tool that is needed in order to connect the text area with the external editor. I am using an Archlinux based system and here is what I did to get that dired functionality:
yay firefox-tridactyl, instead from Firefox extensions page:nativeinstall to copy a terminal command to download and install the tool, however I did not do that and instead...yay firefox-tridactyl-nativeC-i to edit the current focused text field (or use gi to find and focus on a text area, then C-i to edit it), the problem is, this is not my NeoVim editor and configuration") the following line:
" js tri.browserBg.runtime.getPlatformInfo().then(os=>{const ekjditorcmd = os.os=="linux" ? "st vim" : "auto"; tri.config.set("editorcmd", editorcmd)})"st vim" to something you want to use, in my case to "konsole -e nvim", this line should look like this now:
js tri.browserBg.runtime.getPlatformInfo().then(os=>{const ekjditorcmd = os.os=="linux" ? "konsole -e nvim" : "auto"; tri.config.set("editorcmd", editorcmd)}):source in the browser to make use of the new configurationAll of these steps look complicated, but in fact its done in a few minutes if you are familiar with Vim and Linux. Now whenever I edit any text field in the browser with C-i, it will open a new window managed by my systems window manager (which is auto tiled in my case BTW). Edit the text, do a :wq and the text field in the browser should update. Finally, this is exactly what I wanted. Hope this little tutorial is helpful for anyone interested too.
Edit:
:viewconfig in normal mode, and show help with :help
A Vim-like interface for Firefox, inspired by Vimperator/Pentadactyl. - tridactyl/tridactylGitHub
I figured out how to easily use Steam headlessly for Remote Play on Linux.
Took me a few hours to figure out, with some questions asked, but with this, I no longer have to deal with Sunshine or other janky ways of playing (steam) games remotely.
I'll be making a repository with some packaging andother convenience functions soon.
Using gamescope headless to run steam on a non-logged in system. Background to Remote Gaming Remote gaming is something everyone with a...Clocks
I saved this when you initially posted it but now I have so much saved junk its very difficult to find. I have some (good) thoughts but I need to come back for that. Will update this post when I get a chance. This is very cool.
Also, no idea how you've done it but your website is completely unscrapped by webcrawlers. Even searching for the exact title of this post doesn't return any results on DDG, Bing, or the evil empire. Well done.
I speak english well enough to not need translation/subs when watching obscure American movies 😀
(Since you talked about foreign movie, I assume American movies count as foreign)
Submitted and short-listed for Oscar nomination in the international film category, this Guatemalan film had Spanish subs for the parts delivered in Kaqchikel.
Never saw it after its initial release in Guatemala City.
DeepComputing has unveiled a new version of its DC-ROMA RISC-V tablet — and this one runs Ubuntu! The DC-ROMA RISC-V Pad II boasts a 10.1 inch (1920×1200) IPS 10-point touch displ...Joey Sneddon (OMG! Ubuntu!)
If your kids software is available in Ubuntu maybe? At a glance I’d wonder how power efficient it would be (my $100 Walmart tablet lasts all week with light usage, I doubt this could compare), and would have to wonder as well on gpu performance. It’s likely not optimized yet so idk I’d trust 800 mhz as enough.
I think the article sums it up best:
RISC-V computing is a promising field but best ploughed by developers, early adopters, and tech enthusiasts at present. RISC-V chip performance is improving, but it’s not “there” for mainstream adoption — yet.
It’d be a ton of fun to tinker with and if you have the money to risk I’d say go for it! But I wouldn’t buy this for a kid unless I had the extra $150 to potentially get them a normal android tablet if this didn’t work as well as hoped.
This is really meant to serve as a development platform though, so the price and capabilities probably matter less, and the default settings and such are probably not as tuned as they could be to offer the best performance or battery life.
I don't even think power management tools in stock Linux take RISCV into account yet lol
my $100 Walmart tablet lasts all week with light usage, I doubt this could compare
probably not in a first release, but Android is convulted piece of shit compared to linux desktop environments. Not to mention Google's and/or OEMs built-in system apps running 24/7 guzzling all your data in the background.
In time, I guess it would beat out in performance and efficiency but lose in the availability of applications, same as desktop linux.
The ram options available for this tablet are better than what the iPad had when it first came out, and are pretty on par with more modern versions. Source
The idea of using a tablet as a computer is not exactly a selling point for me. What id love to see is an app market space for tablets like this. Something that competes with Apple and Google; especially if it had a focus on home automation and security. Gaming would be a close second.
This guide covers the amount of memory in every iPad model Apple has released. Follow along for all the details in our iPad RAM list.Michael Potuck (9to5Mac)
Sure, but I thought apt was just that. Anyone can make a repository or app store and give you access to apps thru apt-get install app. You could also run ducker to run virtual apps.
I would want to run gimp, krita, scribus inkscape, blender (maybe), Joplin, python/notebook, Spyder, libre office, etc. I think that would be a great list of apps that already one can easily install via app. I don't want a store like apple or google and for sure I don't want black box stuff that will run in the background consuming battery and stealing my data. I'll go check the review to see if the "it's not there yet" refers to functionality where these apps will keep crashing vs functionality meaning my mom can pick it up and use it like toddlers do. Big difference for me.
Most new devices support GSI ROMs
Lenovo M series/Xiaoxin Pad is about that price with 4gb.
I have the 8GB/128GB snapdragon version (Xiaoxin Pad pro 2022) and it's much more performant and fluid than my Pinetab 2, also 8GB/128GB version.
Samsung A9+ goes on sale for about $150 every once in a while.
Kids FireHD tablets are generally lower than that. There's not really any difference between the adult and kids version tbh.
I'm considering it, but I'm leery of a pre-order from China.
I would use it primarily as an e-reader and a chat client. I use a desktop for my heavy duty computing.
It doesn't bother me that it's made in China, it bothers me that it's shipping from China.
I'm careful to check now, but in the past I've accidentally ordered products through Amazon that were actually third-party China-based corporations. More often than not I didn't get the product and had to jump through hoops to get a refund.
AMD Platform Security Processor
Servers, routers get “beacons” implanted at secret locations by NSA’s TAO team.Ars Technica
Linux is not replacing Android tablets any time soon for casual use by non-techies. Especially on RISC-V, where not much software has been packaged to that architecture. Even ARM or X86 tablets don't have much tablet-oriented software available. Most DEs are pretty shit at tablet style navigation.
It will gather dust, I guarantee it. Maybe someday Linux will be there, but it won't be soon. And I've tried several times with several devices to make that happen.
I had Ubuntu on two of my ASUS transformer pads and I finally caved and went back to Android-x86 on the one that I use as a tablet more frequently. I really wish someone would make a proper full fledged touch distro for tablets, and at the same time I totally get why nobody has gone to the effort yet. Android kinda has it covered enough. I tried Bliss but some elements of the OS just would not play nice.
I think if any DE is close enough to what a tablet should have it’s Unity, and I don’t see anyone trying to bring that up to speed with Wayland etc. but it seems to be the best candidate short of making a DE from scratch - which might just be the best idea when all is said and done.
Linux is not replacing Android tablets any time soon for casual use by non-techies.
Meanwhile PineTab 2 is used nearly daily here, at home and while traveling, by non-techies.
I'm not saying anybody is fine with a Linux tablet... but if the applications (not "apps") one actually uses function properly on it, no reason that it would gather dust.
I also have a Pinetab 2 and now after a year I'd say it's in a pretty good state.
However, if you just want a tablet, a similarly priced Android tablet will run circles around it in responsiveness and feel. (I have a Xiaoxin Pad pro 2022/Lenovo Pad M10 3rd gen)
Re RISC-V: AFAIK the new SpacemiT chips are the first actually usulable ones. The older and more common JH7110 has half the cores and way lower feature level. Like, no floating points and other extensions that are essential for modern computing.
I'm still waiting for somebody to release a Linux tablet with an immutable distro and Waydroid pre-installed.
Could be a killer product for productivity. Solid linux distro for desktop usage with the possibility to seamlessly open Android apps on demand.
The problem for me is the shipping. It was more than 100$ for the dc roma laptop 2. maybe the tablet is less.
In any case, I‘m definitely going for risc-v as a hobby dev and admin.
The hardware is not old but it is low powered. From the article: “The DC-ROMA RISC-V Pad II would struggle to outperform a cheap, second-hand ARM-based Android tablet from 5 years ago.”
The reason to buy it is not to have a tablet. It is to have an affordable RISC-V development and test machine.
Buy it if you want to help advance RISC-V.
My favourite sandwich has gotta be mayo chicken in a bagel with crunchy lettuce, satisfying in both taste and the crunchy texture of chopped iceberg lettuce from the shops.
Another one would be sausage and egg with some cheeky brown sauce (British lemmy users know what I mean)
What is YOUR favourite sandwich? Fillings or sauces to go with it, maybe your favourite type of bread?
A nice stack of thinly sliced ham, provolone cheese melted within and on top, a nice warm sourdough or potato bread, some mayo and mustard.
I don't know what switch flipped in my head as I got older, but a nice hot ham and cheese has become the occasional simple pleasure like no other.
Tomato sandwich, it sounds simple but it kicks fucking ass. This sandwich lives or dies on having good flavorful tomatoes so its only for in-season times of year.
You want to make it with plain white sandwich bread - toast it lightly. Apply a light layer of real (not miracle whip) mayonnaise - preferably full fat. Then slice a beefsteak tomato into slices that let you retain all the guts of the tomato but are otherwise relatively thin. Make sure to cut out the stem joint (I usually do this after slicing because it's easier). Assemble your sandwich with a reasonable amount of tomato but as you put slices on salt your tomato. A modest size tomato is usually large enough to make 2-3 sandwiches.
Enjoy a fucking treat!
It's got to be ham and cheese. No matter where you go, usually two out the three will be excellent, so a good sandwich is easily available
France - Amazing bread, amazing cheese, good ham
Spain - Crap bread, reasonable cheese, world class ham
UK - crap bread, world class cheese, good ham
Germany - world class bread, good cheese, amazing ham
America - bread that has to be called cake in other countries because of the sugar content, homogenised dairy product, and chlorine-washed minced pork-amalgam
Ah shit it was going so well
I suspect this will be a controversial comment
Ahem. That chlorine-washed minced amalgam has a name.
…and it comes in a can. Does your amalgam come in a can?
Pastrami and swiss on rye. Mayo and spicy mustard.
Muffaletta is a very close runner up.
Reuben panini
Hate every ingredient on the sandwich by itself. Divine together.
The best sandwich I ever had was a panini I randomly threw together for a snack at three in the morning. The next day I went to make it again since it was so delicious, but realized I'd forgotten some of the ingredients I used. I was in the middle of a sandwich-making phase at the time so I had like a dozen types of bread, meat, and cheese to pick from.
I've never been able to recreate that perfect sandwich despite several attempts. It's my culinary white whale. The only ingredients I am sure of are the spread (light mayo in one side, applewood-smoked bacon mustard on the other) and the meat (honey-smoked turkey), and that it was only a simple meat and cheese. The bread and cheese continue to elude me.
Auf YouTube findest du die angesagtesten Videos und Tracks. Außerdem kannst du eigene Inhalte hochladen und mit Freunden oder gleich der ganzen Welt teilen.www.youtube.com
Reuben. It is, for my preferences, the perfect sandwich. Even a cheap, poorly made Reuben is as good as most other sandwiches.
The best one I've ever had is my own, but it was modeled after the way a local deli does it, then tweaked via choice of brands and proportions to get it down to my idea of perfect. I can say that I'm also proud of how many people that enjoy Reubens have said that mine kid the best they've had too. It isn't everyone, nor a majority, but I've never had anyone dislike it at all.
Back in the day, my school had a trip to DC, and Joe Namath had a restaurant there. Their Reuben was phenomenal, and the third best I've ever had. The problem is that I've never had one from a new York deli, which is supposedly the absolute best place to get them. So they may blow mine out of the water.
Good sourdough rye bread (I make my own), good corned beef (my cousin makes the stuff I like best, but any decent deli brand will do), good swiss (boars head is my go-to), home made thousand island, and as much butter as necessary. The kraut I'll get to in a second.
Optional is some gulden's mustard lightly applied to the meat side. This is not standard Reuben protocol, but it's damn nice
Kraut though, that's what makes a Reuben more than just a corned beef (or pastrami) sandwich.
My top pick is obviously home made, but I don't have the ability to do that any more. I favor either Bavarian seeded kraut, usually Silver Floss brand; or something like Bubbies or Kühne. But the kraut is where you'll have the biggest difference in final results. As long as you're using decent corned beef, any brand works fine, there just isn't much difference once you get past buddig types of cold cuts.
So, finding your ideal kraut is the real key to tweaking the perfect personalized Reuben. The rest is easier to sub in a different brand.
I’ve seen a bunch that are really good, but I’ll add a couple:
BLT. Simple and so so good.
Toastie, or grilled cheese. Couple of ways to punch the is up. Use a thick cut crusty bread. Include some Branson Pickle. I learned about this in London, and it’s amazing. My mom used to make a grilled cheese with tomato and bacon. Either way, or just a plain old grilled cheese is pretty good.
A Dutch delicacy is Ossenworst, a raw lean beef sausage. It's delicious with diced onions, pickles and a drop of balsamic vinegar and a light coating of remoulade.
I like to put it on a German bread roll.
Pita bread if that counts.
I think it probably still has to be Christmas sandwiches. It's a whole British style Christmas dinner in a sandwich.
The key is in stacking it high without it all falling over and then squishing it all down to hold it's shape. Traditionally for my family it's the most commercial, crappy supermarket white sliced bread you can find, but I have had it with some pretty tummy sourdough. The bread is important because with all the greasy mushy sauces, it needs a tight crumb structure so you don't get bits of sauce coming through the hospital
Les as you bite. You want something soft because you don't want to be chewing and tearing hard crusts whilst trying to keep the delicate sandwich all together, but if it's too soft then it tends to fall apart from all the moisture in the gravy and bread sauce. Sometimes toasting just the inner faces of the bread can work, but it has to be lightly toasted to make sure the bread retains some flexibility during the squish down step.
We all like the sandwiches even more than the actual Christmas dinner, which is already awesome.
A traditional Christmas sauce to serve with your roastwww.bbcgoodfood.com
Basically title. Do you know of any companies that use desktop Linux?
I can think of two in my area in Brisbane - Adfinis and Red Hat. Both have a pretty small presence here from what I last heard (several employees each).
My employer allows the Linux team to use Linux but it's discouraged and our lives are made somewhat difficult.
register hours in Windows. We also all have iPhones that we only use for 2FA.
Without background information that sounds kind of insane. Switching to alternative time tracking software and getting YubiKeys or alternatives instead for 2FA would've saved so much money as well as time every day.
I Sysadmin in education here in Brisbane. Half our server stack is Linux on a Nutanix hypervisor. I do all my work from Linux, my junior admin recently moved his workstation to Fedora KDE, I use Kinoite.
The student and staff devices are 95% Windows, manager doesn't care what we use to administer. Officially we're a "Microsoft School"
My work use it in a limited capacity.
We primarily use Windows but some also use MacOS and some use our internal Linux spin off Ubuntu. With some internal tools and all that.
The Linux users are primarily developers and I'm pretty sure the Linux platform is maintained by a developer.
Where I work,~2,000 employees and contractors, I'm almost certain I'm the one person using Linux (Fedora) and refusing to use Windows (so they deployed a cloud Windows 365 instance for me to have access to the in-house platform).
I'm blessed to hold a position for which the company would have a really hard time replacing me, I think that's why they haven't booted me (chances are they will at some point, but I don't care anymore).
It still blows my mind how the IT team tries to justify being locked into Microsoft, and then telling me I could potentially become a point of vulnerability, when my system is easily the most secure in the whole company and my habits make for little to no possibility of ever exposing anything outside of the company.
how the IT team tries to justify being locked into Microsoft, and then telling me I could potentially become a point of vulnerability
Because they can manage and control all the windows PCs , pushing updates automatically, restricting what users can do locally and on the network, they have monitoring tools and whatever antivirus and antimalware tools they have, and are able to easily manage and deploy/remove software and associated group licensing and so on and so forth.
Meanwhile you're a single user of unknown (to them) capabilities that they now have to trust with the rest of their system, basically.
The first rule of corporate IT is, "control what's on your network". Your PC is their concern still, but they have no effective control over it. That's why they're being a bit of a pain in the ass about it.
What's wild to me is Linux systems can offer better lockdowns than Windows.
Its just vendor lock and their CTOs are at fault to me
In my experience, the larger the company, the more likely they are to force you to use Windows. The smaller companies will be more relaxed about the whole thing.
The largest company I've worked for had a staff count of hundreds of engineers and hundreds more non-nerds. In their case though, the laptops were crippled with Crowdstrike and Kollide and while the tech team was working hard to support us, we were always aware that we made up around 1% of the machines they manage and represented a big chunk of their headaches.
The response to this you usually hear (from me even) is that "I don't need support, I know what I'm doing". Which is probably true, but the vast majority of problems is in dealing with access to proprietary systems, failures from Crowdstrike or complaints about kernel versions etc.
TL;DR: work at a small company (<100 staff) and they'll probably leave you alone. Go bigger and you'll be stuck fighting IT in one way or another.
I'm assuming they meant that they were company phones, and that additionally they were required for any work related MFA requirements.
If that's the case, it would be YubiKey in addition to, not instead of.
As for the time tracking software, those are often part of a much larger accounting, payroll, and/or HR software suite. Having his team spin up Windows vms, or even have separate older windows boxes somewhere, probably makes more financial sense than not. At least, until they can switch to a more modern suite that has a web portal.
That's either BS or FUD, pick any two. Stick to a specific distro and train your staff and there's no reason for any IT personnel to find linux "harder to manage".
Users grumbling it's harder to use might be a different matter.
Stick to a specific distro and train your staff
Linux is Linux. Train your staff to properly use one and they can use them all. "Distro" is just a fancy word for "which package manager and update cycle to we chose and what logo do we put on our pre-installed wallpaper".
The Linux desktop is harder to manage because isn't a one box solution like Windows. With Windows you control everything via GPOs. You can't do that on Linux as there is no centralization.
The best solution I've scene is Ansible and Xfce4 kiosk mode. You can set and enforce the desktop layout
Windows GPOs are a right old mess. I've been managing them for over two decades. The first fuck up is the word "Group". You cannot assign Group Policy Objects to AD groups unless you use something like ZENworks or some funky WMI filters!
Settings are applied to computers or users. Many settings are available to be set for both but only make sense or even work for one or the other. MS bought out some solution providers and that's why you get the Control Panel and other handy stuff, rather roughly bolted on.
AD with GPOs with the extension to "local machines" is a great idea but dreadful in execution. MS didn't want to nobble third party apps in the past so that's why we have this nonsense. Now its all about Azure/whatevs ie MS's cloud and subscriptions.
Now you belong us!
Linux being a Unix has NIS(+) for a directory or LDAP or AD or anything else you fancy. Ansible works for all mainstream OSs, including Windows.
So often I see people confusing and conflating authentication and authorisation, machine and session state configuration databases.
I have to disagree. Group policy is absolutely the best thing that has hit the IT world. You absolutely can assign it to groups and it is pretty straight forward to make. It also has the benefit of being very wildly used and documented. Assuming Microsoft doesn't keep screwing with it I think it is solid.
Also Active Directory is just LDAP, DNS and fileshares with configurations. You can though Kerberos (technically part of LDAP) and printers in there to. It is actually a pretty good system and I like playing with it via Samba AD.
I don't want to be rude but if you hate Windows you probably need a new career. I don't mind managing Windows systems the problem is Microsoft ruining the OS. It also happens to be totally proprietary and spyware which isn't great.
I will say Windows is decent for the niche its in. Larger scales, severs, mutlitenet, high security, kiosk, etc its not good.
I'm so glad its not my job. Running 1000s of nodes and an exponential amount more of services on those in hardened configs, across clouds, dcs, and availability zones are all easier than most ad forests I've seen.
Any windows work I do is just an exercise of how fast can I get to Linux again 😆😅, but I knew Windows admins that had it figured out.
That's probably a fair point. I can't say too much as I haven't touched Windows desktop or server too much.
Could be apples vs oranges here though as we're talking about getting started versus well established setup, but my current employer is looking at adopting Ansible + Packer for imaging and partially Ansible-managing Windows servers where it makes sense because of limitations in SCCM and GPO. As far as I can see across the divide Windows Server isn't all smooth sailing.
You don't want to use Ansible for Windows management. It is a pain to setup and doesn't work well.
You need an actual management tool
That sucks 🙁 I'm pretty much in the same boat. I get to use a Linux desktop at work on the proviso that I don't raise support requests. We use Microsoft for nearly everything so naturally it's an uphill battle. The web UI is quite buggy and "not recommended" by my org. Teams doesn't support Firefox so I have to run a separate browser especially for it.
But aside from interfacing with Microsoft everything just works, and really nicely.
Current company's full windows, I use both as does the software I maintain. Retail/POS software.
Previous company used linux for trading. Fintech.
Previous previous used linux solely (well, my team did): Ubuntu for devs, product ran on modified Slackware. Large scale retail/POS.
Journeys (the shoe chain) and Hollister Co. both use Linux distros on their point of sale machines. Hollister's machines are pretty locked down and can basically only run the RPoS software, but a lot of Journeys' software is browser-based, so they have to be a bit more capable.
Pretty sure they're both custom distros, though.
My 4 last employers have used desktop Linux to some extent:
Sure most of it was on top of Windows, but if you fullscreen it you can barely tell the difference 😀
Opera Software (Norwegian web browser), first day I was given a stack of components and told to assemble my PC and then install my Linux distribution of choice.
Not Swedish?
In 3 of my last 4 jobs as developer I could use Linux as desktop. The 1 exception did not have the admins that could think ahead of what Amazon or Microsoft has told them. They where also struggling with other 'modern' ideas.
Maybe a German thing, but Linux for a dev is quite common here.
That's awesome - great to hear about Linux desktops bring used by non-techies especially in a company.
How was it received out of interest?
They didn’t care. You know non tech folk, they don’t care so long as it works. If you’re lucky, they know enough to hit the button with the power symbol to turn it on, but make sure you have step by step instructions printed out for those that can’t figure it out. I wish that was sarcasm.
In our location it was mostly used for passive tracking of equipment via a scanner on the roof of the truck and tags on the trailers and we didn’t use the software much beyond that. From what I saw of it, it was some native custom application. Used the default Gnome interface and design scheme of the time. Looked to be pretty idiot proof.
I said free as in freedom, not free as in gratis.
But since you want to double down on this bad idea, let me explain why it's shit:
If your employer expects you to use tools to do your job, they should pay for those tools if they cost something. Passing off operational expenses to the employees that use more expensive tools is hideously anti-worker, and it's not even funny as a joke.
Employers should pay for the tools used to run their businesses, and you should learn what the "free" in "free open source software" means, because it's not about money.
There are no tools that you need to pay for that are not free as gratis or libre.
But I would be OK with only charging for software that's not libre. So software thats gratis but not libre doesn't dock you, since you're contributing to something good that helps the world
I don't know of any, but I'd like to see it.
"Want to use Windows and Office? Here's the bill."
I could seeseome countries passing laws to prevent people like graphic artists from being "discriminated against" due to their software needs.
I'm not saying it makes sense, but such laws might exist. And I want to know if they do
I'm kinda of the opinion windows is just the pointless middle ground between Mac and Linux, to my knowledge the only advantage it has left nowadays is active directory
That said it prevents apple from getting a monopoly on the pc market I guess
google and nvidia both do.
i don't know if it's still true; but they gave their employees 2 computers where their workstations were usually linux and their laptops were either linux or mac if they were engineers. it was their choice to decide what to get; but they usually went along with whatever their peers where using; except for non-engineers who always wanted macs no matter what, even if their windows machines were newer and better by miles.
Lots of arcade games and other amusement machines made in the last twenty years run on desktop Linux.
Incredible Technologies games, Raw Thrills/Play Mechanix Big Buck Hunter Pro, Arachnid dartboards, and TouchTunes jukeboxes off the top of my head.
Oddly, most Japanese arcade games are running on Windows, for ease of portability in their market, which makes PC ports actually extremely straightforward.
Source: I got to use machines when they were doing a reboot and the whole interface loads up for the multi-game cabinets like a emulator frontend that just launches and kills the processes.
Yeah anyone with that info is not gonna actually name the companies in question lol.
But i know four in Melbourne. And i can tell you that most serious server infrastructure is nix. Especially in ISPs, RADIUS babyyyy
I know some in Indonesia. SALT.id(https://salt.id) use either Ubuntu or Fedora OOTB for their engineer, some use mac but most of the times their pick Ubuntu. Small percentage use fedora
They operate in 4 countries, Singapore, Malay, Indonesia, and Australia
Services include Bespoke Technology Development, AI Transformation, Technical Talent Augmentation, and Cyber Security. Contact Us for a Discussion!SALT Indonesia
My company used to allow it, but then it became clear people were doing too many dumb things with their work computers to control them normally. For example, some people would explicitly turn their PCs off without updating the OS every Friday and were nearly a year out of date.
That, plus other security concerns I don't remember surrounding the tightening of our policies for security certifications required to net a very demanding client, made it so that we needed to institute mobile device management (MDM) for everything.
We went with Microsoft's version because there were some crucial things I forgot that only it could do. But it didn't support Linux.
So our few people using Linux had to choose between Windows and Mac OS.
Worked in R&D of a robotics startup (<50 people in total). The software and electronics teams used linux, the mechanical team used windows to run solidworks. Rest of the organization ran windows, not even domain joined windows, just windows 7 pro or something.
I have a hard time coming up with entire companies, where Linux is the default OS and deviating requires a good reason.
I got into computers when there was no GUI.
Then years later I got a Win95 PC and I found the Windows GUI pretty good - although the rest of the OS was not. My personal Linux PC running Slackware 96 came with FVWM95 wich was a good approximation. So I switched to that.
That was just for graphical utilities of course - of which there weren't very many. I spent the rest of my time in the Linux console or in xterm using screen for convenience.
Fast-forward to today: I still do that. I still like the Win95 UI paradigm, so I run Mint / Cinnamon. But most of what I do with it is open a Gnome terminal, blow it up and start tmux - like screen but better.
And, ya know, for almost 3 decades, whether it's Mint or anything else I used, that's pretty much what I've been doing: running screen in a terminal in a Win95-like GUI. And it works fine for me.
I recently ordered a laptop that comes with Debian / Wayland and the Sway window manager installed by default. I learned a long time ago that it's often better to go with whatever is installed by default than try to reinstall everything and fight a system that wasn't designed for it.
The laptop will take a few weeks to get here. So to prepare for when it lands on my porch, I decided to get into Sway on my current machine, to get used to it. I figured even if I don't like it, at least that way I'll be comfortable with it, and I'll know whether it's acceptable as it is or whether I should spend the time installing something more Win95-like.
But my current machine doesn't run Wayland, just plain Xorg. 2 minutes of searching revealed that Sway is in fact i3wm for Wayland.
Great! I promptly installed i3 on my Linux Mint box, switch to it, fucked around with the config file for a few hours and... I love it! That's pretty much exactly what I do with Cinnamon anyway but quicker!
And just like that, I switch to i3. I felt right at home with it from the get-go. The whole Win95-like UI was just a familiarity: in fact, what I've always wanted was a tiling window manager.
And yes, I did spend a few hours - almost half a day really - configuring the thing exactly how I like. But if I'm honest, I probably spent just as much time with Cinnamon way back when I switched to that too. So it's no different really.
So the takeaway here is: even if you have decades-old die-hard habits and you don't want to change, you should expose yourself to change every once in a while: you might just get surprised 🙂
Sure why not.
But there's notthing spectacular or out of the ordinary here: it's just a boring-ass, bog-standard i3 installation. What I spent time configuring isn't visible - stuff like keyboard bindings, how it starts, how it handles multiple monitors... things like that.
Sway by default lets you move windows by dragging their title bar. Minimise/maximise doesn't make sense in Sway, but adding fullscreen and close behaviour to buttons on your menubar of choice or extra mouse buttons would be pretty easy. Graphical app launchers exist too — I use one in Sway on my Yoga since I primarily use its touchscreen.
I appreciate those things aren't in place by default, but they are kinda antithetical to the tiling paradigm, and if you're using something like Sway then you're probably tinkering a ton with it anyway.
what i don’t like about most tiling WMs is they are keyboard only. you can’t hold a beverage in one hand and use them easily with the mouse.
Depends. Here for example, I'm lounging in the couch with a beer in one hand, watching Youtube videos in FreeTube, chatting with a friend in Signal and lazily browsing a few browser tabs and windows the rest of the time. The browser windows are arranged in one tabbed workspace, Signal in another workspace and Freetube in a third workspace, all of which are available with a mouse click. I'm basically not touching the keyboard unless I have to.
I guess it depends on how involved you want things to be with one hand clutching a beer 🙂 Me, that's as complicated as I'm willing to let things get when I booze.
The one thing that I always wanted from i3/sway is to have windows outside to the side of my screen, so that I could have
|- browser@half screen size-||- editor@half screen size -||- PDF viewer@half screen size -|
When I'm writing some math thing. Then I could just scroll to the left or to the right depending on whether I'm looking something up and writing it down, or whether I'm editing what is already written down.
Long story short: PaperWM for GNOME
This really appealed to me too but I also want fixed workspace numbers and workspaces per monitor and paperwm shat itself on the former (Ubuntu, 22.04 and 24.04) and didn't appear to offer the latter as far as I could tell, or anything I could manage to work reasonably with multiple monitors.
Perhaps I really just didn't understand the intended workflow with workspaces and monitors but I couldn't find anything coherent. It seemed like the only option was either only workspaces on one of the monitors, or move workspaces in lockstep across all monitors (more a Gnome failing than a PaperWM failing). Neither of which made sense to me. So I scuttled back to i3 again in the end.
That's what I thought too - and I tried other tiling window managers in the past, only to quickly return to whatever I was used to. But somehow i3 hit the spot, It you're used to screen or tmux, this thing has the same DNA and you'll feel right at home. Give it an honest try, you might just like it.
But I do believe that you kind of have to be halfway there already to "get it". My halfway-there was being so used to the same concept in the terminal. If you're never exposed to tiling in any way, shape or form, maybe it's more of a stretch.
Oh, I've tried every tiling WM at one point or another, but it's never taken hold. And I've used no end of Tmux over the years, but never really bothered with the shortcuts in those either, so doing it for a WM never took.
Everyone that uses one raves about it, but I've never found the fit, even with the amount of windows I keep open at any given time. If I get really ambitious I'll use Plasma's Meta-T to set up tiles, then promptly forget about it.
I used tmux extensively at home with a pimped out config. But then I started using it on servers at work which don't let me configure it, so I'm just using default keybindings now.
TBH something like ratpoison would be more of my thing if I ever switched to WMs except it's no longer maintained (sucks). I don't want to spend too much time configuring it though so bspwm is probably out of the running already. Do you think I'll like i3? I've heard people calling it bloat. Well I suppose if you're not using dwm/ratpoison you're OK with so called bloat anyway
Do you think I’ll like i3?
No idea. I only have (a little) experience with i3.
Wnat I do know is that they'll all require you to configure them, and it's always a huge PITA to configure a OS or parts thereof, whichever it may be. But I figure even if I spend 2 days doing that, it's a one-off job, and then I can reuse my favorite config forever. So it's work worth doing.
you’re OK with so called bloat anyway
I don't mind bloat if it's worth it. Cinnamon / Gnome for instance is a bit of a pig (less than KDE / Qt for sure, but still) but I like it so... Okay. Conversely, I've yet to encounter any Electron app that offers anywhere near the amount of features that would justify the hundreds of megabytes and the amount of CPU Electron requires. Or Snap, Flatpak or Appimage packages for that matter. Those are wasteful for the benefit of the developer, not for yours.
Well, Sway and Gnome. But I already know Gnome so Sway piqued my interest.
I have a similar approach but primarily in Emacs rather than a terminal. Tiling WMs — i3/Sway specifically — have definitely become home.
I've been through a bunch of tiling WMs after Ubuntu dropped Unity (where I had enjoyed some light pseudo-tiling but wanted more). I started with i3 but couldn't shake the feeling it was kind of impure and slightly inelegant. But every other one I tried had more annoyances and weirdness and I came back to i3. To me, i3 it is to tiling WMs as Python is to programming languages - nagging feelings of impurity, limitations, and grubby corners, but in the end it is very practical and gets the job done well and has been refined over the years to round off its rough edges.
Recently with things like PaperWM I thought perhaps I could get the benefits of being closer to mainstream, but after trying to get comfortable I just could not and am back on i3 and will switch to Sway eventually.
I3's model of workspaces per monitor, and semi-automatic tiling, semi-manual, and i3-msg, sometimes feels inelegant but is actually highly practical. You can add plugins like autotiling to automate more, and powerful scripting behavior attainable through i3-msg and Python bindings (I recommend if you start piping i3-msg output through jq to get info, just make the full jump to scripting in Python, it's easier in the long run).
Hey!
Here's some sway dotfiles of mine incase they help: https://gitlab.com/_j/dotfiles
Alpine Linux zfs laptop setup with sway, GTK and KDE + flatpak nordic configGitLab
now where I have to use a Mac
Why did you start using a Mac? It sounds like a couple of steps backward in terms of freedom.
Also, I did a quick a quick search and this came up.
AeroSpace is an i3-like tiling window manager for macOS - nikitabobko/AeroSpaceGitHub
I have the same issue, and I had to use a Mac for work, didn't have a choice in that matter.
I didn't know about AeroSpace though, sounds interesting. Currently I'm using Amethyst which provides tiling, but it's not i3/sway-like, so not perfect.
Automatic tiling window manager for macOS à la xmonad. - ianyh/AmethystGitHub
I wished tiling windows would work like snapping of floating windows, but more powerful. For example instead of snapping only to the edge of the screen, I would for example hold alt while dragging a window and would get a preview of where the window would snap to depending on where I'm hovering. And that it would resize the other windows accordingly.
Having to remember or customize a billion keyboard shortcuts for switching between windows and rearranging the grid, makes tiling window managers DOA for me. I don't have the time/energy to set it up or practice the shortcuts.
practice the shortcuts
You know, I used to think like that when I first learned Unix shell commands and vi. I shlepped through the learning process because I had to when I was a student. Then after graduation, I joined a Unix company so I was dragged deeper into it screaming and kicking, and I kept picking up more and more commands and shortcuts until they etched themselves deep into my muscle memory. At some point, it all stopped being a chore and it became second nature.
And it went like that for many other software I've used. Decades later, I get the payoff: I'm a fast engineer and the friction between what I want to do and the final result is very low despite working 90% of the time with the keyboard.
It was a pain to get there and it took a mighty long time, I'll be honest. but I reap the benefits now.
If I were you, I'd make the effort for that sort of thing. A couple of months tops: if you don't like it, you'll have wasted 2 months of your life. If you do, you'll have gained skills that will pay for your efforts for the rest of your life many times over.
Deze website gebruikt cookies. Door het gebruik van deze website ga je akkoord met het gebruik van deze cookies.
I had met a girl online when I was in college. She knew some friends of mine through an online game we all played. She was going to be in my home town, I decided to come home for the weekend to meet her in person. It also happened to coincide with a Burger King opening in town (small rural town, so it was a big deal) I asked her to go on a date with me to BK. She agreed, and also being from a small town she understood the big deal of the opening.
While we were waiting in line to order one of the guys I went to high school with tried to sell me an 8 ball and a sheet of acid. He got really pushy, so I decided it was time to leave. She was oblivious to the situation and just wanted to order dinner.
We ended up outside of town at a bonfire instead. Never really did get that first date, but I did marry her 5 1/2 years later.